Re: [Flightgear-devel] NAV receiver specs

2011-11-28 Thread Adrian Musceac
On Monday, November 28, 2011 20:20:03 Eric van den Berg wrote: > > That I do not know. But I do know there are long-range and short-range > VOR-s with significantly different output levels. Not sure how to > determine the difference easily. > For NDB-s it is more easy. The short range ones are on

Re: [Flightgear-devel] NAV receiver specs

2011-11-28 Thread Adrian Musceac
> > The nav.dat file contains 'range' in nm for the nav-aid. > http://data.x-plane.com/file_specs/Nav740.htm > > Perhaps you could use some heuristic to create a reasonable power level to > meet the published range? > > Ron > Oh I see then, my bad, I was not aware of this fact. Of course, the

Re: [Flightgear-devel] NAV receiver specs

2011-11-28 Thread Ron Jensen
On Monday 28 November 2011 11:20:03 Eric van den Berg wrote: > On 11/28/2011 06:14 PM, Adrian Musceac wrote: > > On Monday, November 28, 2011 18:31:42 Eric van den Berg wrote: > >> For GA (what I have handy right now): > >> The good old Garmin 400 series: VOR/LOC:-103.5dBm, GS:-87dBm > >> Avidyne

Re: [Flightgear-devel] NAV receiver specs

2011-11-28 Thread Eric van den Berg
On 11/28/2011 06:14 PM, Adrian Musceac wrote: > On Monday, November 28, 2011 18:31:42 Eric van den Berg wrote: > >> For GA (what I have handy right now): >> The good old Garmin 400 series: VOR/LOC:-103.5dBm, GS:-87dBm >> Avidyne (EntegraII): VOR: 5uV, LOC and GS: 10uV >> >> www.repeater-builde

Re: [Flightgear-devel] NAV receiver specs

2011-11-28 Thread Adrian Musceac
On Monday, November 28, 2011 18:31:42 Eric van den Berg wrote: > For GA (what I have handy right now): > The good old Garmin 400 series: VOR/LOC:-103.5dBm, GS:-87dBm > Avidyne (EntegraII): VOR: 5uV, LOC and GS: 10uV > > www.repeater-builder.com/measuring-*sensitivity*/*dbm*2uv.pdf > /for conversi

Re: [Flightgear-devel] NAV receiver specs

2011-11-28 Thread Eric van den Berg
For GA (what I have handy right now): The good old Garmin 400 series: VOR/LOC:-103.5dBm, GS:-87dBm Avidyne (EntegraII): VOR: 5uV, LOC and GS: 10uV www.repeater-builder.com/measuring-*sensitivity*/*dbm*2uv.pdf /for conversion table!/ The Avidyne is TSO minimums if I remember correctly. Their uni

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Fw: CMake, tomorrow (Sunday 23rd)

2011-11-28 Thread Vivian Meazza
Alan, It's probably exactly the error as described :-). Possibly generated cmake without checking the jsbsim box. Easy to check - is fgJSBSim project in the Solution, and is it selected for build in the Configuration Manager? If that checks out then is "option(ENABLE_JSBSIM "Set to ON to bu

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Fw: CMake, tomorrow (Sunday 23rd)

2011-11-28 Thread ThorstenB
Am 28.11.2011 16:57, schrieb Alan Teeder: > This was sent directly to me. Does anyone know what her problem is > likely to be? > (I, and others , have already given several answers to this question on > the FG forum) > After having compiling in DEBUG & RELEASE mode FlightGear under Windows, > I ge

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Fw: CMake, tomorrow (Sunday 23rd)

2011-11-28 Thread Erik Hofman
On Mon, 2011-11-28 at 15:57 +, Alan Teeder wrote: > This was sent directly to me. Does anyone know what her problem is > likely to be? > > (I, and others , have already given several answers to this question > on the FG forum) > > Alan > > From: Iervolino Fatima > > After having compil

[Flightgear-devel] Fw: CMake, tomorrow (Sunday 23rd)

2011-11-28 Thread Alan Teeder
This was sent directly to me. Does anyone know what her problem is likely to be? (I, and others , have already given several answers to this question on the FG forum) Alan From: Iervolino Fatima Sent: Monday, November 28, 2011 2:18 PM To: ajtee...@v-twin.org.uk Subject: Re: [Flightgear-deve