On 8 Sep 2013, at 17:34, Markus Wanner wrote:
>
> I'm aware of the upcoming release, eagerly awaiting it, and have already
> started packing. Given the decision to slip the 2.12 release, I decided
> to move on with 2.10 rather than wait another month, though.
>
> I'll certainly focus on 2.12
On 09/03/2013 03:28 PM, James Turner wrote:
> For 3.0 I will be making FGData significantly smaller, since the size of
> the Git repo is indeed a big problem.
A huge +1 with my packager's hat on.
Regards
Markus Wanner
-
On 09/08/2013 12:16 PM, Clement de l'Hamaide wrote:
> I'm glad to see you are looking at simgear's update for Debian.
> However we are ready to release simgear 2.12 in next days, so I would
> suggest you to spend your time with simgear 2.12 instead of (soon
> outdated) 2.10
I'm aware of the upcomi
Hi Markus,
I'm glad to see you are looking at simgear's update for Debian.
However we are ready to release simgear 2.12 in next days, so I would suggest
you to spend your time with simgear 2.12 instead of (soon outdated) 2.10
We have a lot of lacks for many years about package diffusion for Ubun
Hi,
I recently uploaded version 2.10 of simgear to Debian, but see it fail
on many platforms. I do not currently have the time to investigate. If
somebody does, please see here:
https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?p=simgear
More importantly: is there any long-term commitment about what
5 matches
Mail list logo
