had the thought that FlightGear
Flight Pro Sim statement, if read/seen in isolation, could give the
impression that Flight Pro Sim is *part of * the FlightGear project, hence
my proposed reworded title above Flight Pro Sim - FlightGear statement.
Mally
-
No virus found in this message
?I'd love to post a comment, but I just can't bring myself to click the
Like button in order to have the right to do so... Doh!
Mally
- Original Message -
From: Vivian Meazza vivian.mea...@lineone.net
To: 'FlightGear developers discussions'
flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Sent
of these ads (in all their
variations) is increasing. It can only mean that an increasing number of
people are actually following the ads up with orders.
Mally
- Original Message -
From: Chris Wilkinson blobster...@yahoo.com.au
To: FlightGear developers discussions
flightgear-devel
?Looks familiar?
http://www.proflightsimulator.com/index3.html
Not to be confused with FlightProSim (obviously).
Mally
-
No virus found in this message.
Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
Version: 10.0.1153 / Virus Database: 424/3259 - Release Date: 11/15/10
rather than
buying a product, then I would be very happy to see him succeed in his
venture, and I'm sure he would be providing a valuable service.
Mally
- Original Message -
From: Chris Wilkinson blobster...@yahoo.com.au
To: FlightGear developers discussions
flightgear-devel
campaign
with potentially a massive reach.
Mally
PS. It's just struck me that even his advert headline is misleading NEW
Flight Simulator (my emphasis).
PPS. I will check (if I can) if any code attributable to me is in the
source. I think not, I was just debugging for someone else who had the code
and imprecision, great, that's what we need. However we
seem to be locked into thinking the legality hinges *only* on whether or not
the source code is supplied complete with relevant notices (it is) and
ignoring other important terms in the GPL. (Which I won't repeat here yet
again).
Mally
be
persuaded to do the same for FPS it would go a long way to addressing my
main concerns, namely that the public are not being fully informed before
making a purchase.
Mally
-
No virus found in this message.
Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
Version: 10.0.1153 / Virus Database: 424/3251 - Release Date
the advert itself, so I'm not sure it's worth the hassle of me
uploading it somewhere. I can send you a copy privately by email if you
like.
Mally
-
No virus found in this message.
Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
Version: 10.0.1153 / Virus Database: 424/3249 - Release Date: 11/10/10
their own
copyright in this way over a product based substantially or wholly on a GPL
source? You tell me...
Mally
-
No virus found in this message.
Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
Version: 10.0.1153 / Virus Database: 424/3248 - Release Date: 11/10/10
time right now to go back and look again, but I will if people here
think there is any mileage in following any of this up.
Mally
-
No virus found in this message.
Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
Version: 10.0.1153 / Virus Database: 424/3248 - Release Date: 11/10/10
for doing this other
than my general sense of distaste?
Mally
-
No virus found in this message.
Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
Version: 10.0.1153 / Virus Database: 424/3246 - Release Date: 11/09/10
--
The Next 800
using ajax and whatever, so there's no URL I can usefully give
you. The advert is no longer there for me, though I do have a saved copy of
the page with it on, plus a screenshot. Has anyone else seen it?
Mally
- Original Message -
From: Arnt Karlsen a...@c2i.net
To: flightgear-devel
of)/.
Mally
- Original Message -
From: Curtis Olson curtol...@gmail.com
To: FlightGear developers discussions
flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Sent: Wednesday, October 20, 2010 1:39 PM
Subject: Re: [Flightgear-devel] Ridding Multiplayer of Abusers
It would not be dissimilar
with an
automated system of blocking and control?
Mally
- Original Message -
From: syd adams adams@gmail.com
To: FlightGear developers discussions
flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Sent: Tuesday, October 19, 2010 3:25 PM
Subject: Re: [Flightgear-devel] Ridding Multiplayer of Abusers
the same sort of thinking would apply to determining what constitutes
a major release?
Just my thoughts
Mally
- Original Message -
From: Durk Talsma durkt...@gmail.com
To: FlightGear developers discussions
flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Sent: Wednesday, October 13, 2010 9
the detail of specifically which points are currently considered weak. They
were probably state-of-the-art when they were first implemented, just as it
happens, they out of sync with the rest, and will surely catch up (or
overtake!) in the normal course of development.
Mally
- Original Message
17 matches
Mail list logo
