On 1/30/07, Curtis Olson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
FlightGear seems like a perfect platform to rig up their experiment.
So my question is this ... to save us some time, does anyone out there have
a 3d train model in their back pocket they would be willing to contribute to
FlightGear?
i
On 12/8/06, Heiko Schulz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
But If Flightgear want to be realistic, and we want
aircrafts showing us what happen when you do something
wrong you can't close your eyes about this.
i see this conversation flare up on the x-plane lists from time to time.
collision
On 9/29/06, Ampere K. Hardraade [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Also I do not want this work, that I do
for entertainment, to be used for Real Life (TM) military purposes. The
latter is a moral position.
I simply avoid this moral position by not creating any military model. :)
*sigh*
seems
On 6/13/06, Major A [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
As to my suggestion of linking FG and X-Plane to fly FG on VATSIM,
i think better, would be to provide an integration within x-plane that
would allow it to use the FG MP server system.
x-plane has an SDK that would make this quite possible i think,
On 6/13/06, Martin Spott [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Curtis L. Olson wrote:
The issue is that the specific elevation of a specific point on the
earth can be different between sims.
Ok, this is obvious and in fact is an issue of scenery fidelity, but
it is not a problem that could be resolved
On 6/13/06, Martin Spott [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Tony Pelton wrote:
Read Curt's posting,
i did ... and i think i _do_ understand the basics of the issue ...
he simply assumes that the ground elevation at a
specific location differs between two sims. Different sims have their
scenery
On 6/12/06, Martin Spott [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Justin Smithies wrote:
On the other hand I was told that certain people didn't care about
licensing and hacked the VATSIM authentication protocol
for reference ...
On 6/10/06, dene maxwell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I know from my experience with FGTools, FGFS and TaxiDraw that parsing the
APT file is not trivial ...the downside is of course the need for a
SpecialAPT.DAT to cater for this and the inherent support and maintenance
needed.
it's interesting
On 6/10/06, Ralf Gerlich [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Writing a parser is always work we rather wouldn't be doing as we'd
rather devote ourselves to working with the data than to reading or
writing it from or to file.
yes. using XML, any number of parsers are available, AND they can do
well
hi all,
i'm new around here.
is there a list i can join, or someone i can ask, such that i could
get e-mail from the CVS server when someone commits to the codebase ?
i'm slowly trying to get up to speed on the codebase, and seeing what
things people are working on, by seeing what code they are
not sure if folks on this list care, or are aware ... but Ben Supnik
has made a couple of RFC type posts to one of the x-plane lists,
talking about a new design for the airport data coming from Robin
Peel.
This is apparently the spec that is emerging from those conversations.
11 matches
Mail list logo
