Vivian
I have managed a compile of Flightgear. "Nic" was correct, props .hxx, not
props.cxx. Flightgear and Simgear both now have NOMINMAX in my pre-processor
defines.
Flightgear needed most of the new modules from simgear\scene\material to be
added to Simgear library before it would link.
That seems to have done the trick : edit props.hxx, not .cxx to use
SGMath.hxx and defining #NOMINMAX at project level seems to work.
More testing later, got to run.
Thanks to Vivian and Tim for taking time to sort it out,
Cheers,
Nic
On Mon, Jul 20, 2009 at 8:50 AM, Vivian Meazza wrote:
> Al
Alan,
simgear-config.h cannot be used in SGMisc.cxx because it is called from fg
as well as sg. SGMisc will not compile without NOMINMAX , so you need it in
your pre-processor definitions. Unless you have a better way .
The error you report is the very one that replacing the SGMathFwd.hxx
i
On Sun, 19 Jul 2009 12:43:41 -0400, Nicolas wrote in message
<808354800907190943ic2f7c59g389bedc9eb3f1...@mail.gmail.com>:
> Sorry about calling you clueless, btw, I mistakenly thought your post
> was from the same person who linked to the propaganda bullshit site
..you refer to http://grokdoc.n
And I forgot - you need to change #include to
#include in props.cxx
-Original Message-
From: Vivian Meazza [mailto:vivian.mea...@lineone.net]
Sent: 19 July 2009 23:47
To: 'FlightGear developers discussions'
Subject: Re:
[Flightgear-devel][Simgear-cvslogs]CVS:source/simgear/propsprops
Alan,
Tim's fixes are now in CVS although not quite finished: you might have to
add NOMINMAX to your pre-processor definitions.
I'd be interested to hear how you get on.
Vivian
-Original Message-
From: Alan Teeder [mailto:ajtee...@v-twin.org.uk]
Sent: 19 July 2009 17:52
To:
No problems.
My code-writing skills are even worse than they were when I retired. Once
upon a time I thought that I had the hang of C++, but these days I think
that I must have been mistaken.
_
From: Nicolas Quijano [mailto:nquij...@gmail.com]
Sent: 19 July 2009 17:44
To: FlightGe
Sorry about calling you clueless, btw, I mistakenly thought your post was
from the same person who linked to the propaganda bullshit site on MS : I'm
no fan of MS, but I'm tired of falsehoods being used to critique them.
Especially as all those examples were null or so badly distorted to be
absolut
Sorry folks, I seem to have started a flame war. This is not the right
place.
Alan
_
From: Nicolas Quijano [mailto:nquij...@gmail.com]
Sent: 19 July 2009 17:23
To: FlightGear developers discussions
Subject: Re:
[Flightgear-devel][Simgear-cvslogs]CVS:source/simgear/propsprops.cxx,
cl.exe which compiles C and C++ has nothing in common with the CLR compiler
(.NET).
Unrelated issues, and what Curtis said : a bit of perspective, gcc is NOT
100% compliant either.
The issue has to do with standards compliance and C++ idioms, not MS
business strategy
Funny how any sense of perspect
Olson [mailto:curtol...@gmail.com]
Sent: 19 July 2009 15:30
To: FlightGear developers discussions
Subject: Re: [Flightgear-devel]
[Simgear-cvslogs]CVS:source/simgear/propsprops.cxx, 1.44, 1.45 props.hxx,
1.32, 1.33
On Sun, Jul 19, 2009 at 7:10 AM, Arnt Karlsen wrote:
On Sun, 19 Jul 2009 09:27:57
On Sun, Jul 19, 2009 at 7:10 AM, Arnt Karlsen wrote:
> On Sun, 19 Jul 2009 09:27:57 +0100, Alan wrote in message
> <5fe353c04d92459a9dbf8d42d1b97...@ajtmain>:
>
> > Thanks for the quick reply, and best wishes with the solution. Why oh
> > why are MS compliers so pernickety?
>
> ..business strateg
On Sun, 19 Jul 2009 09:27:57 +0100, Alan wrote in message
<5fe353c04d92459a9dbf8d42d1b97...@ajtmain>:
> Thanks for the quick reply, and best wishes with the solution. Why oh
> why are MS compliers so pernickety?
..business strategy:
http://grokdoc.net/index.php/Dirty_Tricks_history#C.2B.2B
http
] [Simgear-cvslogs]
CVS:source/simgear/propsprops.cxx, 1.44, 1.45 props.hxx, 1.32, 1.33
Alan Teeder
> RE: [Simgear-cvslogs] CVS: source/simgear/props props.cxx, 1.44,1.45
> props.hxx, 1.32, 1.33
>
> Sadly, props.hxx is still getting me errors with MSVC 2008 - se
14 matches
Mail list logo
