On ven 29 août 2008, Bill Galbraith wrote:
> > With Catapult it is less a problem, with answering time
> > delay, i mean it should work.
> > Catapults features need only to know the "starting position"
> > with a more or less value precision: a carrier with 20 km
> > speed does 5.6 meter per secon
> With Catapult it is less a problem, with answering time
> delay, i mean it should work.
> Catapults features need only to know the "starting position"
> with a more or less value precision: a carrier with 20 km
> speed does 5.6 meter per second => 0.50 1/10 sec => 0.05 1/100 sec
>
> The
On mar 26 août 2008, Melchior FRANZ wrote:
> * gerard robin -- 8/26/2008 11:23 AM:
> > Won't it be possible to get with a generic Nasal script?
> >
> > with the closest Carrier:
> > The Catapults position with heading.
> > The wire positions Left/right position.
>
> Could be problematic. The invo
On mar 26 août 2008, Csaba Halász wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 26, 2008 at 11:23 AM, gerard robin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On mar 26 août 2008, gerard robin wrote:
> >> On lun 25 août 2008, Jon S. Berndt wrote:
> >> > As posted by Dave in the JSBSim mailing list, I firmly agree:
> >> > determining ca
* gerard robin -- 8/26/2008 11:23 AM:
> Won't it be possible to get with a generic Nasal script?
>
> with the closest Carrier:
> The Catapults position with heading.
> The wire positions Left/right position.
Could be problematic. The involved subsystems are handled at different
places in the ma
On Tue, Aug 26, 2008 at 11:23 AM, gerard robin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On mar 26 août 2008, gerard robin wrote:
>> On lun 25 août 2008, Jon S. Berndt wrote:
>> > As posted by Dave in the JSBSim mailing list, I firmly agree: determining
>> > carrier location and orientation should not be an FDM
On mar 26 août 2008, gerard robin wrote:
> On lun 25 août 2008, Jon S. Berndt wrote:
> > > Hello,
> > >
> > >...
> > >
> > > In order to get these data into the JSB FDM, the crude solution could
> > > be, to
> > > include the yasim calculation part into JSBSim.
> > >
> > > I feel that won't be the
On lun 25 août 2008, Jon S. Berndt wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> >...
> >
> > In order to get these data into the JSB FDM, the crude solution could
> > be, to
> > include the yasim calculation part into JSBSim.
> >
> > I feel that won't be the more elegant solution, and i am not sure that
> > Jon
> > wo
> Hello,
>
>...
>
> In order to get these data into the JSB FDM, the crude solution could
> be, to
> include the yasim calculation part into JSBSim.
>
> I feel that won't be the more elegant solution, and i am not sure that
> Jon
> would agree on it. :)
>
> Though, i am not aware, about the FG
Hello,
There is, into the recent FDM JSBSim update, a new huge feature with is
the "External_Forces", this gives us, a lot of new facilities for model
development, like mooring rope, chutes, catapults, hook, mules and so on.
Each external_force can be defined "BODY" or "LOCAL".
Working on an
10 matches
Mail list logo
