On Thu, Sep 16, 2010 at 1:28 PM, thorsten.i.r...@jyu.fi wrote:
You just discovered that Nasal is 10x slower than C++
code! This is exactly why I prefer core code to end up in C++ in the end.
I don't think that's a valid interpretation of my results. Consider the
two cases where I achieved
On Wed, 15 Sep 2010, Erik Hofman wrote:
After thinking about it I think that in the second case the property
tree is being walked trough by the C++ code while in the first case it's
done in Nasal. You just discovered that Nasal is 10x slower than C++ code!
This is exactly why I prefer core
On Thu, 2010-09-16 at 08:59 +0200, Anders Gidenstam wrote:
I think a bigger issue might be that both getChild() and getNode()
create and return a hash object that is only used once here before
becoming garbage. Since this was loop with many iterations a good deal of
garbage was created so
You just discovered that Nasal is 10x slower than C++
code! This is exactly why I prefer core code to end up in C++ in the end.
I don't think that's a valid interpretation of my results. Consider the
two cases where I achieved a significant performance gain by replacing
hard-coded structures
* thorsten.i.r...@jyu.fi -- 9/16/2010 1:28 PM:
I don't think that's a valid interpretation of my results. Consider the
two cases where I achieved a significant performance gain by replacing
hard-coded structures with my own Nasal code (range animation,
distance_to() method)
The distance_to()
The distance_to() method is a pretty standard great circle calculation,
and that's exactly its purpose. Are you sure your faster version does
the same? Does it yield the same (numeric) results? And besides, in the
visual range direct_distance_to() should be good enough, and it's
certainly
I've just spent a session optimizing performance of the weather dynamics
routines, and I have largely done so by analyzing the performance of
elementary Nasal function calls and making use of my findings (and also by
dispensing with the pretense of elegant coding).
I was rather gratified to see
thorsten.i.r...@jyu.fi wrote:
I've just spent a session optimizing performance of the weather dynamics
routines, and I have largely done so by analyzing the performance of
elementary Nasal function calls and making use of my findings (and also by
dispensing with the pretense of elegant
8 matches
Mail list logo
