Re: [Flightgear-devel] Rating system (was Re: New release)

2010-12-13 Thread thorsten . i . renk
I suggest the following: 18 or higher = advanced production (minimum 4 in each rating) 16 to 17 = production (minimum 4 in each rating) For production perhaps at most 1 category with a 3 rating all others 4 and above to get a little bit of a sliding scale between production and advanced

[Flightgear-devel] Rating system (was Re: New release)

2010-12-12 Thread Stuart Buchanan
On Sun, Dec 12, 2010 at 9:42 AM, Martin Spott wrote: Stuart Buchanan wrote: Martin - does this address your concern? Well, at the end of the day it's completely irrelevant if my concerns are being addressed  ;-) Not at all. Such decisions need to have community-wide buy-in to have any effect,

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Rating system (was Re: New release)

2010-12-12 Thread Stuart Buchanan
On Sun, Dec 12, 2010 at 8:20 PM, Hal V. Engel wrote: On Sunday, December 12, 2010 11:59:30 am Stuart Buchanan wrote: I also like having a minimum for each individual rating category so that everything has to have had approx. the same level of work to move up the status scale. I could