Oliver C. wrote:
Here are my results:
With VBO enabled i get 150-195 frames/s
With VBO disabled i only get 90-120 frames/s
So VBO makes a difference of 60-75 more frames per seconds.
I made this benchmark test on a computer with an Athlon Thunderbird 1 GHz
CPU, 512 MB SDRam and a Geforce 4 4200 T
Jon Berndt wrote:
Erik Hofman wrote:
Add a protocol for the ACMS protocol which seems to be used as an
output format for black-box data flight data. This configuration
does not work directly since there is no FDM available that reads
the accelerations from the property tree and translates them int
Horst J. Wobig wrote:
Oliver C. wrote:
Here are my results:
With VBO enabled i get 150-195 frames/s
With VBO disabled i only get 90-120 frames/s
So VBO makes a difference of 60-75 more frames per seconds.
Before other people think "WOW, FG could run 60% faster!!!", please keep in
mind that an appl
Erik Hofman writes:
> Jon Berndt wrote:
> >>Erik Hofman wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >>>Add a protocol for the ACMS protocol which seems to be used as an
> >>>output format for black-box data flight data. This configuration
> >>>does not work directly since there is no FDM available that reads
> >>>the accel
On 17 Oct 2004, at 10:15, Erik Hofman wrote:
Before other people think "WOW, FG could run 60% faster!!!", please
keep in
mind that an application like FG can't do everything just by using
VBOs and DLists.
For what it's worth, experts keep telling me the display lists are
always faster than VBO's
James Turner a écrit :
On 17 Oct 2004, at 10:15, Erik Hofman wrote:
Before other people think "WOW, FG could run 60% faster!!!", please
keep in
mind that an application like FG can't do everything just by using
VBOs and DLists.
For what it's worth, experts keep telling me the display lists are
James Turner wrote:
On 17 Oct 2004, at 10:15, Erik Hofman wrote:
Before other people think "WOW, FG could run 60% faster!!!", please
keep in
mind that an application like FG can't do everything just by using
VBOs and DLists.
For what it's worth, experts keep telling me the display lists are
alw
This is now in CVS. I would like to encourage aircraft maintainers to take a
look at the two generic configurations in Aircraft/Generic/, and add/remove
systems and instrumentation to their aircraft. Override the generic
configurations in the same way as you overrice the generic autopilot:
Add t
FG 0.9.6 and CVS won't run on my Mandrake 9.2 system.
It keeps aborting when I try to run it (without displaying errors).
GDB output
(gdb) run
Starting program: /home/paul/Dev/flightgear/bin/fgfs
Program received signal SIG32, Real-time event 32.
0x4002b714 in pthread_getconcurrency () f
Hi all!
I've not touched the new submodel.*xx sources yet because I want your opinion
on how I should implement it into the other configurable systems.
The existing configurable systems are the pitot, static, and vacuum systems.
These are configured in one configuration file defaulting to
Airc
Hi guys
I managed to narrow the problem down! Yay!
If I remove the joystick drivers (sidewinder and joydev) so that my joystick
is not detected then FlightGear loads then the problem disappears.
So it seems as if something changed in the joystick code between 0.9.5 and
0.9.6 that is causing a p
From http://www.flightgear.org/:
| October 15, 2004 - FlightGear IRC
|
| We now have two FlightGear IRC channels available. If you have time to burn, \
| try one or both of them.
| 1. Host = "irc.linuxforen.de", channel = "#flightgear".
| 2. Host = "irc.flightgear.org", channel = "#flightgea
* Melchior FRANZ -- Sunday 17 October 2004 23:53:
> These two channels are actually the same:
>
>$ host irc.linuxforen.de
>irc.linuxforen.de has address 83.246.114.104
>
>$ host irc.flightgear.org
>irc.flightgear.org has address 83.246.114.104
BTW, that's actually my fault. I had
Roy Vegard Ovesen wrote:
> Sent: 17 October 2004 20:19
> To: FlightGear developers discussions
> Subject: [Flightgear-devel] Submodels
>
> Hi all!
>
> I've not touched the new submodel.*xx sources yet because I want your
> opinion
> on how I should implement it into the other configurable syst
[I'm afraid I'm not subscribed to the plib devel list, so I hope that by
posting this message here, the info will get passed on to the right person]
I'm running FlightGear on an old linux box (RedHat 7.3)
For the first time in a few months, I tried out a freshly updated
version of FlightGear thi
On Monday 18 October 2004 05:44, Eric L Hathaway wrote:
> I'm running FlightGear on an old linux box (RedHat 7.3)
>
> For the first time in a few months, I tried out a freshly updated
> version of FlightGear this afternoon, with plib, SimGear, and FlightGear
> all pulled from CVS. I noticed that t
I'll reply to my own message to point out that my problem with
FlightGear's joystick handling in Linux is not unique: Roy Vegard
Ovesen noted the same root cause of this problem a few weeks ago in a
posting to this list:
http://baron.flightgear.org/pipermail/flightgear-devel/2004-September/030
The attached patch modifies the JSBSim config file for the f15. The
patch does two things:
1) It increases the fuel load to nearly full internal fuel -- the
current default load-up only has 100 lbs of fuel onboard and thus runs
out of gas after less than a minute of flight time. Max internal
18 matches
Mail list logo