[Flightgear-devel] Re: Possible config (file type) problem?

2005-01-23 Thread Melchior FRANZ
* William Earnest -- Sunday 23 January 2005 18:53: After last evening's snow and today's wind, the METAR from KABE is a bit messed up, and the parser that extracts the conditions went wild and clobbered who-knows-what in the properties. Sorry, but no. This is neither messed up, nor does it

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Re: Possible config (file type) problem?

2005-01-23 Thread William Earnest
Melchior FRANZ wrote: * William Earnest -- Sunday 23 January 2005 18:53: After last evening's snow and today's wind, the METAR from KABE is a bit messed up, and the parser that extracts the conditions went wild and clobbered who-knows-what in the properties. Sorry, but no. This is neither

[Flightgear-devel] Re: Possible config (file type) problem?

2005-01-23 Thread Melchior FRANZ
* William Earnest -- Sunday 23 January 2005 20:10: The missing item was the sky condition field, but the weather applet in RH reported it as invalid. Ok. SimGear is a bit more liberal. After all, many/most reports are generated by humans, and I didn't want to throw the whole message away

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Re: Possible config (file type) problem?

2005-01-23 Thread Erik Hofman
Melchior FRANZ wrote: With no sky report, FG showed the default scattered condition. Really? It shouldn't display scattered by default if METAR is on. Only CAVOK should creat a scattered layer. This is probably the network detection code kicking in. After three failed attempts, three seconds

[Flightgear-devel] Re: Possible config (file type) problem?

2005-01-23 Thread Melchior FRANZ
* Erik Hofman -- Sunday 23 January 2005 21:14: Melchior FRANZ wrote: * * William Earnest -- Sunday 23 January 2005 20:10: With no sky report, FG showed the default scattered condition. Really? It shouldn't display scattered by default if METAR is on. Only CAVOK should creat a scattered

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Re: Possible config (file type) problem?

2005-01-23 Thread Erik Hofman
Melchior FRANZ wrote: * Erik Hofman -- Sunday 23 January 2005 21:14: This is probably the network detection code kicking in. After three failed attempts, three seconds apart (if I recall it correctly) the code will not do any further attempts to get the data I know, but I thought William is