Re: [Flightgear-devel] JSBsim with Solaris8/Sparc and GCC-3.4.1

2004-09-17 Thread Oliver C.
On Friday 17 September 2004 17:30, Jon Stockill wrote: > Boris Koenig wrote: > > If you keep receiving errors/warnings about "underquoted definitions" in > > M4 macros, it's most likely really pretty much the same thing as with > > gcc: the autotools folks intend to become much pickier, too - so, i

Re: [Flightgear-devel] JSBsim with Solaris8/Sparc and GCC-3.4.1

2004-09-17 Thread Jon Stockill
Boris Koenig wrote: If you keep receiving errors/warnings about "underquoted definitions" in M4 macros, it's most likely really pretty much the same thing as with gcc: the autotools folks intend to become much pickier, too - so, in that case it's not really a FG issue but rather the new versions en

Re: [Flightgear-devel] JSBsim with Solaris8/Sparc and GCC-3.4.1

2004-09-17 Thread Boris Koenig
Jon Stockill wrote: On a similar toolchain related theme, I just upgraded a machine here to slackware 10.0, which uses autoconf-2.59 and automake-1.8.5, which caused all sorts of problems when attempting to compile current cvs versions of simgear and flightgear. Rolling back to autoconf-2.57 and

Re: [Flightgear-devel] JSBsim with Solaris8/Sparc and GCC-3.4.1

2004-09-17 Thread Jon Stockill
Jim Wilson wrote: Norman Vine said: Martin Spott writes: Erik Hofman wrote: They really should be fabs() in both cases, both GetState() and GetTolerance() return a double instead of an int. Thanks ! Any idea why this doesn't show up on other platforms ? gcc is getting *much* pickier on the road

RE: [Flightgear-devel] JSBsim with Solaris8/Sparc and GCC-3.4.1

2004-09-17 Thread Jim Wilson
Norman Vine said: > Martin Spott writes: > > > > Erik Hofman wrote: > > > > > They really should be fabs() in both cases, both GetState() and > > > GetTolerance() return a double instead of an int. > > > > Thanks ! > > Any idea why this doesn't show up on other platforms ? > > gcc is getting

Re: [Flightgear-devel] JSBsim with Solaris8/Sparc and GCC-3.4.1

2004-09-15 Thread Martin Spott
"Norman Vine" wrote: > gcc is getting *much* pickier on the road to being c++ standards compliant Even pickier than MIPSpro !? I'm amazed, Martin. -- Unix _IS_ user friendly - it's just selective about who its friends are ! --

RE: [Flightgear-devel] JSBsim with Solaris8/Sparc and GCC-3.4.1

2004-09-15 Thread Norman Vine
Martin Spott writes: > > Erik Hofman wrote: > > > They really should be fabs() in both cases, both GetState() and > > GetTolerance() return a double instead of an int. > > Thanks ! > Any idea why this doesn't show up on other platforms ? gcc is getting *much* pickier on the road to being c++

Re: [Flightgear-devel] JSBsim with Solaris8/Sparc and GCC-3.4.1

2004-09-15 Thread Erik Hofman
Martin Spott wrote: Erik Hofman wrote: They really should be fabs() in both cases, both GetState() and GetTolerance() return a double instead of an int. Thanks ! Any idea why this doesn't show up on other platforms ? I think the other compilers just issue a warning and convert the double to an

Re: [Flightgear-devel] JSBsim with Solaris8/Sparc and GCC-3.4.1

2004-09-15 Thread Martin Spott
Erik Hofman wrote: > They really should be fabs() in both cases, both GetState() and > GetTolerance() return a double instead of an int. Thanks ! Any idea why this doesn't show up on other platforms ? Martin. -- Unix _IS_ user friendly - it's just selective about who its friends are ! ---

Re: [Flightgear-devel] JSBsim with Solaris8/Sparc and GCC-3.4.1

2004-09-15 Thread Erik Hofman
Martin Spott wrote: Hello, I must admit that it's not completely clear to me if this stems from using GCC-3.4.1 or simply from the recent changed to JSBsim (I assume the latter) so I'd be happy if anyone could tell me: make[4]: Entering directory `/usr/local/src/FlightGear/src/FDM/JSBSim' [...] g++