Message-
From: Arnt Karlsen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, May 31, 2002 10:09 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [Flightgear-devel] Dual monitors
On Thu, 30 May 2002 19:37:16 -0700 (PDT),
Gene Buckle [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
If memory serves
On Thu, 30 May 2002 19:37:16 -0700 (PDT),
Gene Buckle [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
If memory serves, it's a Radeon VE. I'm using it with two 17 flat
panels. The machine is a Dell dual P4 running Win2k.
..hmmm. Have you tried it under Linux? Mandrake 8.2 or
Red
If memory serves, it's a Radeon VE. I'm using it with two 17 flat
panels. The machine is a Dell dual P4 running Win2k.
..hmmm. Have you tried it under Linux? Mandrake 8.2 or
Red Hat 7.3 may be a better choise to support the card,
considering ATI's policy towards XFree86.org and
On Thu, 30 May 2002 13:57:09 -0600
Boslough, Mark B [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I am attempting to run flightgear under Windows 2000 on a
machine with 2
monitors. My primary monitor is driven by a Geforce 3,
and my second one is
...
MX, so I don't think it is a video driver problem. Is
-
From: Jon S Berndt [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, May 30, 2002 2:05 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [Flightgear-devel] Dual monitors
On Thu, 30 May 2002 13:57:09 -0600
Boslough, Mark B [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I am attempting to run flightgear under Windows 2000
On Thu, 30 May 2002 14:14:13 -0600
Boslough, Mark B [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thanks Jon,
Mine are both single head, the Geforce 3 is AGP and the other
is PCI. Maybe that's the problem. I always run with the heads-up
display anyway so the panel problem probably would not be an issue
for me.
Jon S Berndt writes:
I'm not sure how things would work if you run with two
video cards.
Think about some of the implications ...
For instance, textures are stored on the card, so if you load a
texture into one card, it would some how need to be loaded into the
2nd card if a portion of the
Does that mean that my GeForce 3 is overkill for fgfs?
-Original Message-
From: Jon S Berndt [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, May 30, 2002 2:25 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [Flightgear-devel] Dual monitors
On Thu, 30 May 2002 14:14:13 -0600
Boslough, Mark
Boslough, Mark B writes:
Does that mean that my GeForce 3 is overkill for fgfs?
As I understand it, the GeForce3 can run at higher resolutions than a
GeForce2 for the same frame rate. The GeForce3 introduces workable
antialiasing. The GeForce2 antialiasing is not generally useful
... i.e.
On Thu, 30 May 2002 13:57:41 -0700 (PDT)
Gene Buckle [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It's generally accepted in the flight simulator community
that trying to
get two out-the-cockpit views on the same computer is a
Bad Idea(tm).
I might modify your statement to read: two individual
video cards on
Jon S Berndt writes:
A dual head card - at least in my case - works very good.
The drawback is as I stated before, but that can be fixed
by not displaying the panel. The HUD, however, is split
between two monitors. Other than that, it's flawless and
fast.
This is one of the arguments for
On Thu, 30 May 2002 14:13:31 -0700 (PDT),
Gene Buckle [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
The only dual-head card I'v ever dealt with is this ATI peice of crap
in my workstation here at work. It *sucks* (for VERY large values of
suck). ATI couldn't write a driver
The only dual-head card I'v ever dealt with is this ATI peice of crap
in my workstation here at work. It *sucks* (for VERY large values of
suck). ATI couldn't write a driver properly if you held a gun to
their collective heads and their lives depended on it.
..which ATI dual head
13 matches
Mail list logo
