Re: [Flightgear-devel] Re: bo105 + patch

2004-08-20 Thread Josh Babcock
Alex Romosan wrote: Melchior FRANZ <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: * Alex Romosan -- Saturday 07 August 2004 01:19: as a matter of fact it does seem that european helicopters behave differently from american ones. Yes, you are right, sorry. I was slightly pissed, because if felt as if you needlessly d

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Re: bo105 - patch

2004-08-09 Thread Ron Lange
I don't like the way this discussion goes by now. Because I'll finish the second fgfs heli soon, I want to show my point of view in this matter may to finish this argument soon, too...;-) If you choose an input modality which is closer to the reality - eg. using stick, pedals and a 'park-break-

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Re: bo105 - patch

2004-08-08 Thread Jim Wilson
Melchior FRANZ said: > * Jeff Sinsay -- Saturday 07 August 2004 16:28: > > Yes indeed, when looking from the top down American Helicopters > > rotate-counter clockwise, while European/Russian Helis rotate > > clockwise. > > Yes, that's widely known. But nobody would seriously assume that > anyw

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Re: bo105 + patch

2004-08-06 Thread Gene Buckle
> * Alex Romosan -- Saturday 07 August 2004 00:36: > > you can clearly hear the woman say that if you lift the collective you > > increase the pitch of the blades so you get more lift and you'll go > > up. so it would seem that collective up means helicopter goes up. > > maybe in austria they do it

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Re: bo105 + patch

2004-08-06 Thread Ron Lange
i am not sure what the collective has to do with the throttle. if i understand this correctly, the collective changes the pitch of the rotor blades. i thought helicopters don't have a throttle the way fixed wing aircraft do: i.e. the engine is always at a constant rpm. but then i am not a helicopt

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Re: bo105 + patch

2004-08-06 Thread Frederic Bouvier
Alex Romosan wrote: > Melchior FRANZ <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > * Alex Romosan -- Friday 06 August 2004 21:31: > >> and i noticed that the collective is mapped backwards > >> (up goes down and down goes up). > > > > Yes, and that's the way it should be and there's no way in hell to have > >