* Andy Ross <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > I'd say the X52 then has exactly this problem. One bit is always on,
> > since it has a mode-switch (doesn't do anything without the
> > windows-software) which always has a bit set.
>
> You can write a joystick definition to use that mode switch however
> you
Fridtjof Busse wrote:
> I'd say the X52 then has exactly this problem. One bit is always on,
> since it has a mode-switch (doesn't do anything without the
> windows-software) which always has a bit set.
You can write a joystick definition to use that mode switch however
you want; on all systems.
* Richard Harke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > OK, I'll try that, thanks for the help.
> I'm not familiar with your joystick model but apparently it is similar
> to the X45. fgjs will not work with X45 because of the way a couple
> of mode switches work. They always have at least one of the bits on
> whi
On Wednesday 30 March 2005 02:40, Fridtjof Busse wrote:
> * Melchior FRANZ <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > > I'm trying to use fgjs to "calibrate" my joystick [...]
> >
> > You put "calibrate" under quotes. So you know that fgjs doesn't
> > calibrate anything?
>
> Yes, I do. "Assigning axis/buttons" would
* Melchior FRANZ <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > I'm trying to use fgjs to "calibrate" my joystick [...]
>
> You put "calibrate" under quotes. So you know that fgjs doesn't
> calibrate anything?
Yes, I do. "Assigning axis/buttons" would have been a better
description.
> For calibrating use jscal. If y
