Re: Segmentation Fault: (was Re: [Flightgear-devel] Ready for next release?)

2004-07-29 Thread Durk Talsma
Yes, the following files were missing. Curt wrote me yesterday that he had missed them somehow while updating from cvs, but that he has them now and thus be in the final release. The segfault I'm getting is not related to these missing files though, because that would only give a problem durin

Re: Segmentation Fault: (was Re: [Flightgear-devel] Ready for next release?)

2004-07-29 Thread Erik Hofman
Durk Talsma wrote: Hmm, I hate to spoil the party, but I did get a segmentation fault in FlightGear today (running 0.9.5-pre3). I'm not sure when it happened, since I started FlightGear this morning and letting it fly between KSFO and EHAM (which appears to become my favorite test route :-)), wh

Segmentation Fault: (was Re: [Flightgear-devel] Ready for next release?)

2004-07-29 Thread Durk Talsma
Hmm, I hate to spoil the party, but I did get a segmentation fault in FlightGear today (running 0.9.5-pre3). I'm not sure when it happened, since I started FlightGear this morning and letting it fly between KSFO and EHAM (which appears to become my favorite test route :-)), while I went off to

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Ready for next release?

2004-07-29 Thread Jim Wilson
Erik Hofman said: > Jim Wilson wrote: > > "Curtis L. Olson" said: > > >>Sounds fine, I wasn't planning on rolling out the official release today > >>anyway. Tomorrow is probably the earliest ... more likely friday. > > > > Just a heads up: there is a minor (as in easy to fix) issue with build

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Ready for next release?

2004-07-29 Thread Erik Hofman
Jim Wilson wrote: "Curtis L. Olson" said: Sounds fine, I wasn't planning on rolling out the official release today anyway. Tomorrow is probably the earliest ... more likely friday. Just a heads up: there is a minor (as in easy to fix) issue with building SimGear using gcc 2.96 that was introduc

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Ready for next release?

2004-07-28 Thread Jim Wilson
"Curtis L. Olson" said: > Durk Talsma wrote: > > >Curt, > > > >I'd say "almost". My stuff has been checked in and seems to work fine now. My > >only concern is that I just downloaded pre3 about two hours ago and haven't > >even had a chance to compile it. Therefore, I'd prefer to wait just a li

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Ready for next release?

2004-07-28 Thread Durk Talsma
Just one quick note: There are still a number of traffic files missing from the fgfs-base-pre3, even though they are in CVS now. Unfortunately, these file are required, even when the traffic manager is disabled. Fixing this is on my todo list, but I likely won't be able to fix this before the

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Ready for next release?

2004-07-28 Thread Curtis L. Olson
Durk Talsma wrote: Curt, I'd say "almost". My stuff has been checked in and seems to work fine now. My only concern is that I just downloaded pre3 about two hours ago and haven't even had a chance to compile it. Therefore, I'd prefer to wait just a little longer. Probably just a day or so to see

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Ready for next release?

2004-07-28 Thread Durk Talsma
Curt, I'd say "almost". My stuff has been checked in and seems to work fine now. My only concern is that I just downloaded pre3 about two hours ago and haven't even had a chance to compile it. Therefore, I'd prefer to wait just a little longer. Probably just a day or so to see if anything unexp