On Sunday, 19 December 2004 19:24, Frederic Bouvier wrote:
> As far as I understand the source, it is bound to the "load-aircraft"
> command. So I guess that it is intended to be called from an xml file,
> presumably a menu or a dialog.
Thanks, I missed that part.
I'll give it a whirl and see what
Frederic Bouvier wrote:
Paul Surgeon a écrit :
What is the status of fgLoadAircraft in aircraft.cxx?
Was it ever actually used and if so what was it's functional state?
At the moment it's just dead code - it's not called from anywhere.
As far as I understand the source, it is bound to the "load-
Paul Surgeon a écrit :
What is the status of fgLoadAircraft in aircraft.cxx?
Was it ever actually used and if so what was it's functional state?
At the moment it's just dead code - it's not called from anywhere.
As far as I understand the source, it is bound to the "load-aircraft"
command. So I
On Saturday, March 29, 2003, at 05:57 pm, James Turner wrote:
I don't get why aircraft.cxx defines fgLoadAircraft as a static
inline, since both of these seem wrong; it's a large function to
inline (and not called frequently, I assume), and it's been declared
in a public header file.
Silly me,
