Re: [Flightgear-devel] flightgear.org webpage screenshot problem

2006-04-19 Thread Curtis L. Olson
Julien Pierru wrote: I tried to visit the screenshots section on flightgear.org http://flightgear.org but the link links to Gallery-v0.9.9 instead of Gallery-v0.9.10... Where did you find the broken link? Curt. -- Curtis Olsonhttp://www.flightgear.org/~curt HumanFIRST Program

[Flightgear-devel] Re: Subsystem run-levels

2006-04-19 Thread Melchior FRANZ
* James Turner -- Tuesday 18 April 2006 17:22: [runlevel groups] Melchior is probably the best person to comment on how appropriate or not these are for the Nasal scripts he's written. I'm not aware of any Nasal module that really depends on a subsystem, although I haven't looked with this in

[Flightgear-devel] Re: Openal is missing stuff

2006-04-19 Thread Sid Boyce
The instructions needed a closer look, the portable CVS module is the one Linux needs, then openal/alut needs to be built and installed. FlightGear-0.9.10 has taken off. Regards Sid. Sid Boyce wrote: During build it complains that AL/al.h is missing and the only header file in linux/include is

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Re: Subsystem run-levels

2006-04-19 Thread Curtis L. Olson
Melchior FRANZ wrote: * James Turner -- Tuesday 18 April 2006 17:22: [runlevel groups] Melchior is probably the best person to comment on how appropriate or not these are for the Nasal scripts he's written. I'm not aware of any Nasal module that really depends on a subsystem,

[Flightgear-devel] Re: flightgear.org webpage screenshot problem

2006-04-19 Thread Melchior FRANZ
* Julien Pierru -- Wednesday 19 April 2006 20:20: it's on the Menu titled Main on the left hand side of the home page(actuay every page that contains that menu), the section Screenshots links to the wrong gallery. No, the link is fine. You just have to force a page reload (Shift-reload on most

[Flightgear-devel] Re: flightgear.org webpage screenshot problem

2006-04-19 Thread Melchior FRANZ
* Melchior FRANZ -- Wednesday 19 April 2006 20:38: So the html file is old most of the time? That would explain why proxies don't consider it worth updating. No, wait. That doesn't make sense. If it is unchanged, then no proxy needs to be tricked into updating it anyway. Hmm. But maybe the js

[Flightgear-devel] Re: FGLive 0.1 alpha available for testing

2006-04-19 Thread Pigeon
I've tried it in my ATI based laptop (Radeon Mobile 9000 - M9) - but it didn't work :( Very much expected :( I'll e-mail you privately about this ati issue. Apart from that: - - I couldn't select my screen size of 1400x1050 I'll add that. - - I couldn't select the German

Re: [Flightgear-devel] JSBSim engine config

2006-04-19 Thread Dave Culp
On Sunday 16 April 2006 03:44 pm, Paul Surgeon wrote: On other thing I'd like to know is : How does one over rev a turbofan engine in real life? I know it's not modeled in FG yet but I'm curious as to what actually happens in real life to get an over speed problem. I have over 14000 hrs in

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Re: tower.cxx

2006-04-19 Thread David Luff
Melchior FRANZ writes: First off, I want to say that I don't want to put David's work down. This *is* a complicated matter, and *much* work went into it, and the feature works very well (when it works) and I enjoy it a lot. It's really only the crashes that are annoying, and the fact that we

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Re: tower.cxx

2006-04-19 Thread David Luff
Vassilii Khachaturov writes: I recall Durk Talsma was once telling about an in-house (closed source) fgfs-based system with a huge number of AI planes, in the tens of thousands IIRC. Probably not all talking to the same tower though? Durk's stuff is all still the scripted AI as far as I

Re: [Flightgear-devel] JSBSim engine config

2006-04-19 Thread Paul Surgeon
On Wednesday 19 April 2006 23:33, Dave Culp wrote: I have over 14000 hrs in turbines and have only seen one overrev, and that was caused by a failed fuel control. Oh ... so it's that scarce. In that case I won't worry about modeling it. Thanks Paul

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Re: FGLive 0.1 alpha available for testing

2006-04-19 Thread Georg Vollnhals
Hi Pigeon, the idea to have a FG-live-CD was great but how you did it is even greater, my compliments! :-)) I tested it with AMD64 3700, 1 GB RAM, NVidia 6600GT 256 MB and made 3 long testflights (B1900, C172). This is what I found (beside all those positive aspects which I can't mention

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Speed discontinuity

2006-04-19 Thread Ampere K. Hardraade
On Wednesday 19 April 2006 01:21, John Wojnaroski wrote: A change that large (13 knots!!) is a major wind shear. Might it make sense to provide some sort of filtering or extrapolation between stations to moderate such extreme changes Regards John W. I also find it extremely annoying. This

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Re: Re: Re: FGLive 0.1 alpha available for testing

2006-04-19 Thread Georg Vollnhals
Pigeon schrieb: Sorry I should be more specific. Try doing jscal -c /dev/js0 and the follow the instructions. After that see if the joystick works better (or worse ;) Hi Pigeon, now, at the end of a long night (5:11 am) I have to thank a) Pigeon, who gave me the right hints

[Flightgear-devel] Re: FGLive 0.1 alpha available for testing

2006-04-19 Thread Pigeon
I've tried it in my ATI based laptop (Radeon Mobile 9000 - M9) - but it didn't work :( Very much expected :( Now that I think about it again, i should probably make it much much much more obvious at the X driver dialog prompt. At the moment it asks if you'd like to change