Hello ...
After the recent autopilot update , altitude hold doesn't work anymore for
me , (using pi-simple-controller)
Im not sure what effect to expect with the anti-windup addition , but my
guess is it's just exposing my poor
configuration.
Cheers
Ran into this , thinking I had a problem with the Primus 1000 ...
When I try a reset from the menu , I get this error :
passed invalid index (0) to FGRouteMgr::jumpToIndex
Fatal error: name may contain only ._- and alphanumeric characters
Ive been trying to hunt this down , but too tired
syd adams wrote:
Ran into this , thinking I had a problem with the Primus 1000 ...
When I try a reset from the menu , I get this error :
passed invalid index (0) to FGRouteMgr::jumpToIndex
Fatal error: name may contain only ._- and alphanumeric characters
This looks like a comment from
乌兰巴根 wrote:
Hi guys:
I ever successfully build and run the flightgear-1.9.1 under WindowsXP
by MSVC90. It is a great work and very interesting.
Last week I download the source packege of flightgear-2.0.0.
Build the source of flightgear is OK, but when step to debug, there is
an
On 15 Mar 2010, at 23:49, Michael A. K. Gross wrote:
I haven't seen this happen elsewhere, so I suspect it may not have been
noticed, hence the bug report.
This is a bleeding edge CVS, with bleeding edge OSG and SimGear as
well. Debian linux with the latest graphics driver from Nvidia,
On 16 Mar 2010, at 08:14, Erik Hofman wrote:
When I try a reset from the menu , I get this error :
passed invalid index (0) to FGRouteMgr::jumpToIndex
Fatal error: name may contain only ._- and alphanumeric characters
This looks like a comment from the xml parser.
Ouch - the first
- Erik Hofman a écrit :
乌兰巴根 wrote:
Hi guys:
I ever successfully build and run the flightgear-1.9.1 under
WindowsXP
by MSVC90. It is a great work and very interesting.
Last week I download the source packege of flightgear-2.0.0.
Build the source of flightgear is OK, but
James Turner wrote:
On 16 Mar 2010, at 08:14, Erik Hofman wrote:
What are the steps to reproduce - fire up the Bravo and hit 'reset'?
I've committed a slightly more helpful exception message in props.cxx
It'll provide something like:
Fatal error: '!' found in propertyname after 'velocities'
Hello ...
After the recent autopilot update , altitude hold doesn't work anymore for
me , (using pi-simple-controller)
Im not sure what effect to expect with the anti-windup addition , but my
guess is it's just exposing my poor
configuration.
Syd,
if you are referring to the b1900d
On 16 Mar 2010, at 08:43, Frederic Bouvier wrote:
Durk use exceptions to return errors. FP means Flight Plan, not Floating
Point. That's normal program execution, but it's really annoying when you
want to debug because all these exceptions are a performance killer for the
debugger, and it
Hello guys:
Firstly, thanks for all reply.
I am sure the source package of flightgear and simgear both are v2.0,and I
have download the latest plib,openAL,OSG and so on.
By now, I have to fix this by return a bool value.
I will try to find other way.
Thanks!
wlbg
I
- James Turner a écrit :
On 16 Mar 2010, at 08:43, Frederic Bouvier wrote:
Durk use exceptions to return errors. FP means Flight Plan, not
Floating Point. That's normal program execution, but it's really
annoying when you want to debug because all these exceptions are a
performance
On 16 Mar 2010, at 11:12, Frederic Bouvier wrote:
I've changed this code to stop using exceptions-as-return values - I
believe the fix should be in 2.0.0, but I'm not 100% positive about
that.
I am pretty sure it is not
I committed the fix on 19th February, it seems - evidently that
On Tue, Mar 16, 2010 at 9:58 AM, Erik Hofman e...@ehofman.com wrote:
James Turner wrote:
I've committed a slightly more helpful exception message in props.cxx
It'll provide something like:
Fatal error: '!' found in propertyname after 'velocities'
name may contain only ._- and alphanumeric
I could reproduce with all the aircraft of mine ... haven't tried anyone
else's yet .
Ouch - the first message is mine - the second I can't claim responsibility
for.
What are the steps to reproduce - fire up the Bravo and hit 'reset'?
James
On Mon, Mar 15, 2010 at 7:01 PM, syd adams adams@gmail.com wrote:
I have to agree that much can't be done . I hate to see it removed from the
forum , flame war or not , since keeping as much information out there as
possible might keep a few some being conned .
I was thinking the other
- Curtis Olson a écrit :
If this guy points his users at our forum, that also might be a benefit to us.
If flightsimpro users start showing up and asking questions, we could again
be patient and welcoming, but explain the situation to them. That way at
least for the future, they can
- James Turner a écrit :
On 16 Mar 2010, at 11:12, Frederic Bouvier wrote:
I've changed this code to stop using exceptions-as-return values -
I
believe the fix should be in 2.0.0, but I'm not 100% positive
about
that.
I am pretty sure it is not
I committed the fix on 19th
On 16 Mar 2010, at 15:01, Curtis Olson wrote:
There are a lot of different angles here, but I think whatever we do, we
can't take out our frustrations on the end users that flightsimpro manages to
sucker into buying a copy of FlightGear without telling them what it actually
is.
The guy
From: Frederic Bouvier
Sent: Tuesday, March 16, 2010 3:21 PM
To: FlightGear developers discussions
Subject: Re: [Flightgear-devel] News from FlightProSim!
Users of FlightProSim have been scammed and they should not endure our
anger. But I am not happy to do the FPS support for
OK , could be something on my end. I'll dig a little deeper after work.
Cheers
On Tue, Mar 16, 2010 at 10:46 AM, James Turner zakal...@mac.com wrote:
On 16 Mar 2010, at 14:08, syd adams wrote:
I could reproduce with all the aircraft of mine ... haven't tried anyone
else's yet .
filed as
Hi Folks,
This is a little off-topic, but I thought I'd write a little about a rather
bizarre experiment I'm currently running, involving one high-powered 64-bit
Linux machine, my currently still cold living room, a central heating system,
and a semi-infinitely looped shell script that keeps
is it on webcam ?
Durk Talsma wrote:
Hi Folks,
This is a little off-topic, but I thought I'd write a little about a rather
bizarre experiment I'm currently running, involving one high-powered 64-bit
Linux machine, my currently still cold living room, a central heating system,
and a
On Tuesday 16 March 2010 10:15:57 pm Pete Morgan wrote:
is it on webcam ?
Euuh, no. It's really not that interesting to watch anyway. :-)
Cheers,
Durk
--
Download Intel#174; Parallel Studio Eval
Try the new software
Hi Durk,
No idea about modern machines, but I've certainly had past machines that got
flaky due to cpu cooling deficiencies. I've also had video cards with the
same issue. I believe there should be an lm-sensors package where you can
measure fan speed and cpu temp while you run. That can be
Hi Curt,
A shakey power supply would indeed be my alternative hypothesis. However, I
would find it hard to imagine that the city power grid would be so much more
stable than the university's power network (which I believe is also connected
to the public power grid anyhow). In addition, at
On Tue, 16 Mar 2010 22:52:36 +0100, Durk wrote in message
201003162252.37060.d.tal...@xs4all.nl:
Hi Curt,
A shakey power supply would indeed be my alternative hypothesis.
However, I would find it hard to imagine that the city power grid
would be so much more stable than the university's
I can confirm this happens with the Tu-154B freeware model.
James Turner wrote:
On 16 Mar 2010, at 08:14, Erik Hofman wrote:
What are the steps to reproduce - fire up the Bravo and hit 'reset'?
I've committed a slightly more helpful exception message in props.cxx
It'll provide something
Hmm, why not change the license on some of the newer planes to a more
restrictive creative commons license? This would give you more control over
how these are used. For instance, you could apply the license so the planes
could only be use for non-commercial/free projects, and if a commercial
On Wed, Mar 17, 2010 at 12:18 AM, Rob Oates carrotr...@gmail.com wrote:
Hmm, why not change the license on some of the newer planes to a more
restrictive creative commons license? This would give you more control over
how these are used. For instance, you could apply the license so the planes
Last I heard, The GPL license was applied to all the planes hosted on the FG
website. I do believe however, that if we do take our own planes and put them
in a restrictive CC license and then give permission for FG and only FG to use
them, then we may be able to do some good.
On Mar 16, 2010,
Durk Talsma wrote:
Hi Curt,
A shakey power supply would indeed be my alternative hypothesis.
Hi Durk,
I am not an electronics expert but I guess the temperature will affect
the power supply too. And I think modern CPU/MB have temperature check
built in and slow the clock to compensate.
Hmm ... the planes in Flightgear are just models, they don't require simgear
and terragear to function. Furthermore I would find it extremely bizarre for
an airplane model to be a dependency in order for Flightgear to work.
I think it's reasonable to say there should be a clear separation between
That only helps make it clear if someone is violating a copyright. It doesn't
help enforce it. If the license is changed, and then someone were to go and
sell FG with those aircraft who would hire the lawyer bring the copyright
violation law suit?
--Adam
On Mar 16, 2010, at 4:26 PM, kyle
Good point, didn't account for that.
On Mar 16, 2010, at 8:05 PM, Adam Dershowitz wrote:
That only helps make it clear if someone is violating a copyright. It
doesn't help enforce it. If the license is changed, and then someone were to
go and sell FG with those aircraft who would hire the
Well you should know how to pick your fights ... you don't have to chase
every single violator, just pressure the one or two who are giving you the
hardest time (like this Pro-sim guy). At least by changing the license on
some of the planes and art work (which are not dependent on anything already
Thanks for the explanation , that does help clear a few things .I'll
probably redo these files again shortly .
Cheers
On Tue, Mar 16, 2010 at 2:34 AM, Torsten Dreyer tors...@t3r.de wrote:
Hello ...
After the recent autopilot update , altitude hold doesn't work anymore
for
me , (using
As I have not been able to find any doc's or forum topics expounding on it,
could someone explain a few things to me about Instant Replay?
First off, what parameters are logged by it, or what defines if a parameter is
logged by it? ie, thrust reverser use do not replay, but flaps do. This
38 matches
Mail list logo
