Am Donnerstag, den 07.04.2011, 17:12 +0200 schrieb Arnt Karlsen:
Hi,
..ju52 and ju52floats has lost airframe visibility, powerplants,
gear, struts and floats, cabin and cockpit remains visible, cabin
floor is invisible from below, looks funny kinky but flies fine.
..this (shader bug???)
Adrian wrote:
After a brief search (1h!), I couldnt find a way to get any of the the
terragear tools sources; am I a googlagnostic or something, or did I
simply miss sth important...?
Usually the latest source tree is available at:
Catherine James wrote
-Original Message-
From: [mailto:catherine.ja...@att.net]
Sent: 08 April 2011 04:30
To: flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: [Flightgear-devel] Hurricane gearDown() and gearToggle()
Nasalfunctions
It absolutely drove me nuts that the Hurricane,
Ron Jensen wrote:
Martin: Can we PLEASE ungzip apt.dat in the repository so we can track changes
to it!
The GIT repository you mean ? Ask those who decided do put a compressed
file there, _I_ am just continuing an old tradition.
Cheers,
Martin.
--
Unix _IS_ user friendly - it's just
Martin Spott wrote:
Usually the latest source tree is available at:
http://mapserver.flightgear.org/git/gitweb.pl?p=terragear-cs
but it looks like we're having a server failure right now.
It's back, network error
Martin.
--
Unix _IS_ user friendly - it's just
* Jari Häkkinen -- Wednesday 06 April 2011:
The GPL ideology is to keep the or later clause.
I'm not much into ideologies. I consider both GPLv2 and GPLv3
acceptable. But I don't intend to ever (again) license anything
with an or later clause. This is signing a contract without
reading it first!
Martin wrote:
Ron Jensen wrote:
Martin: Can we PLEASE ungzip apt.dat in the repository so we can track
changes
to it!
The GIT repository you mean ? Ask those who decided do put a compressed
file there, _I_ am just continuing an old tradition.
Don't we unzip all the navaids stuff on
On Fri, 8 Apr 2011 10:42:38 +0200, Melchior wrote in message
201104081042.39...@rk-nord.at:
* Jari Häkkinen -- Wednesday 06 April 2011:
The GPL ideology is to keep the or later clause.
I'm not much into ideologies. I consider both GPLv2 and GPLv3
acceptable. But I don't intend to ever
Flightgear-commitlogs wrote:
commit e275005a9691dfe4cc4b53c0ff386bbed7600414
Author: BARANGER Emmanuel
Date: Fri Apr 8 00:04:09 2011 +0200
New plane : Piper Pa32 Saratoga
Ah, _this_ is one I'd really like to fly in real life, it fits my
license and allows for a nice week-end trip with
Am Freitag, den 08.04.2011, 10:42 +0200 schrieb Melchior FRANZ:
And I don't consider the or later clause to be in the spirit
of the GPL at all. (In the spirit of the FSF, yes.) Because an
or later clause allows a fork under a license that is not
compatible with what the original work is
* kreuzritter2000 -- Friday 08 April 2011:
That's the reason why the or later clause is important, it can protect
your intentions in the future.
Or it can be completely against my intentions. Hard to say before I read
the text of the GPLv4, GPLv5 etc. I don't need a master who protects my
Am Freitag, den 08.04.2011, 14:21 +0200 schrieb Melchior FRANZ:
* kreuzritter2000 -- Friday 08 April 2011:
That's the reason why the or later clause is important, it can protect
your intentions in the future.
Or it can be completely against my intentions. Hard to say before I read
the
Hi all,
for example the airport LFPG has a parking position with a name with
spaces in it. My little launcher script [1] does currently not support
this because of a for() loop will break those spaces into seperate
lines.
Assume that ${OPTIONS} is the list of command-line parmeters (I know, I
Hi Roland,
Roland Häder wrote:
Can those spaced names be fixed e.g. to names with underscores? Or
won't FGFS (latest GIT/master here) find them?
I think it's impracticable to force every parking position name
worldwide not to have spaces, especially since it may be just a name
and not an
Martin Spott wrote:
Ron Jensen wrote:
Martin: Can we PLEASE ungzip apt.dat in the repository so we can track
changes
to it!
The GIT repository you mean ? Ask those who decided do put a compressed
file there, _I_ am just continuing an old tradition.
BTW, are you still referring to this
Hi Martin,
okay, I already have an idea, freely from my mind:
$ sed s/\ /FGFS_LAUNCHER_SPACE/
If that is working, I think no parking lot will be named with that. :)
Regards,
Roland
On Fri, 2011-04-08 at 18:51 +, Martin Spott wrote:
Hi Roland,
Roland Häder wrote:
Can those spaced
On Friday 08 April 2011 13:44:49 Martin Spott wrote:
Martin Spott wrote:
Ron Jensen wrote:
Martin: Can we PLEASE ungzip apt.dat in the repository so we can track
changes to it!
The GIT repository you mean ? Ask those who decided do put a compressed
file there, _I_ am just continuing
On 2011/04/08, at 14:45 , Roland Häder wrote:
Hi all,
for example the airport LFPG has a parking position with a name with
spaces in it. My little launcher script [1] does currently not support
this because of a for() loop will break those spaces into seperate
lines.
Assume that
Ron Jensen wrote:
On Friday 08 April 2011 13:44:49 Martin Spott wrote:
Please consider my response c) here:
http://www.mail-archive.com/flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net/msg28111
.html
before blaming me/us on behalf of your private adventure. _I_
still consider FG as sort of a
Hi,
thanks for that valuable hint! I have rewritten my script to use arrays
(and encapsulated adding parameters to it). Now I just need to rewrite
multiple parameters to single... :(
Regards,
Roland
On Fri, 2011-04-08 at 23:28 +0200, Pascal J. Bourguignon wrote:
On 2011/04/08, at 14:45 ,
Thanks Martin, that was it... I found a lot of links to
mapserver.flightgear.org which didn't work (DIDn't!). Now happily
cloning.
Am Freitag, den 08.04.2011, 08:11 + schrieb Martin Spott:
Martin Spott wrote:
Usually the latest source tree is available at:
Hi,
I have also fixed multiple lines. Version 1.3.1 is out. :)
Regards,
Roland
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
--
Xperia(TM) PLAY
It's a major breakthrough. An authentic gaming
Hello,
my investigation came a little step forward. According to skyop in chat:
--
Quix0r: FYI, there is NO problem with JSBSim. The problem lies in the
FDM.
--
Can you please investigate here?
Regards and still in big hope
Recently, I've been spending a good bit of time attempting to program all of my
most-used aircraft so that I can engage and disengage the autopilot through the
joystick. I've been able to get this to work on the Seneca II with a short
nasal script in Nasal/SenecaII.nasal that sets the
Maybe you already looked into this , but to me it would make more
sense to bind the joystick buttons to activate the enable properties
in the actual autopilot.xml files rather than modifying the author's
specialized scripts.Or write a generic nasal file to handle the
variety of different enabling
25 matches
Mail list logo