Re: [Flightgear-devel] RFC: changes to views and cameras

2008-08-01 Thread Tim Moore
Tim Moore redhat.com> writes: > > Hi, > I'd like your comments on some changes to views and OSG cameras in > FlightGear before I start working on them. In particular, my > understanding of how FGViewer works might not be complete. > I've implemented what I described here. The property nodes

Re: [Flightgear-devel] RFC: changes to views and cameras

2008-06-30 Thread Mathias Fröhlich
Tim, On Saturday 28 June 2008, Tim Moore wrote: > I received a private comment about this point too. Mapping cameras to > different windows, which can be opened on arbitrary screens, will > absolutely still be supported. I know that multi-GPU setups are > important for professional users and our

Re: [Flightgear-devel] RFC: changes to views and cameras

2008-06-28 Thread Tim Moore
On Sat, 28 Jun 2008 09:04:59 +0200 Mathias Fröhlich <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Hi Tim, > > On Thursday 26 June 2008, Tim Moore wrote: > > Problems With the Current Approach > > > > Many features are not now possible using only a single running > > instance of FlightGear. There can't be more

Re: [Flightgear-devel] RFC: changes to views and cameras

2008-06-28 Thread Mathias Fröhlich
Hi Tim, On Thursday 26 June 2008, Tim Moore wrote: > Problems With the Current Approach > > Many features are not now possible using only a single running instance > of FlightGear. There can't be more than one view at a time. It would be > nice to keep the principal "out the window" view around -

Re: [Flightgear-devel] RFC: changes to views and cameras

2008-06-26 Thread Tim Moore
On Thu, 26 Jun 2008 16:23:03 + (GMT) Heiko Schulz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi, > > at least from my point it sounds good and resonable. These are > features really missing and will not only keep FlightGear up to date > aganinst the commercial sims- it will make it better. > > > > > Thi

Re: [Flightgear-devel] RFC: changes to views and cameras

2008-06-26 Thread Heiko Schulz
Hi, at least from my point it sounds good and resonable. These are features really missing and will not only keep FlightGear up to date aganinst the commercial sims- it will make it better. > > This proposal is a little vague; the specifics need to be > worked out > when the CameraGroup is im

Re: [Flightgear-devel] RFC: changes to views and cameras

2008-06-26 Thread Tim Moore
On Thu, 26 Jun 2008 14:23:23 +0100 "Vivian Meazza" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Tim Moore wrote > > > Sent: 26 June 2008 11:53 > > To: FlightGear developers discussions > > Subject: [Flightgear-devel] RFC: changes to views and cameras > > > &g

Re: [Flightgear-devel] RFC: changes to views and cameras

2008-06-26 Thread Vivian Meazza
Tim Moore wrote > Sent: 26 June 2008 11:53 > To: FlightGear developers discussions > Subject: [Flightgear-devel] RFC: changes to views and cameras > > Hi, > I'd like your comments on some changes to views and OSG cameras in > FlightGear before I start working

[Flightgear-devel] RFC: changes to views and cameras

2008-06-26 Thread Tim Moore
Hi, I'd like your comments on some changes to views and OSG cameras in FlightGear before I start working on them. In particular, my understanding of how FGViewer works might not be complete. What we have now FGViewer calculates the parameters of a view. This includes camera-independent parameters