On Monday, September 05, 2011 20:01:29 Durk Talsma wrote:
>
> I'm a little pressed for time this week, so I have to keep my response a
> little on the short side. In essence, I think that this would be any
> extremely cool feature to have. Do you already have a working copy that
> you would consid
Adrian Musceac wrote:
> I have started to implement radio signal attenuation into the ATC subsystem,
> with the goal to later move this to it's own location.
I'm pretty certain that future will show us many possible uses for a generic
implementation (just think of FGCom). Nice to hear about it,
If you know the phone number of the ATC facility, you should be able
to enter it into a popup that looks like a satphone and communicate
with them without the attenuation constraint. Oh, and extend the ATC
dialog to understand "say phone number" and "on landing call"
interactions.
On Mon, Sep 5,
Hi Adrian,
>
> So far, only ground to AI aircraft and AI aircraft to ground is implemented,
> as part of the FGATCController class.
> This system, if proven functional, should probably be split into a separate
> module and applied to all comunication, including player-to-ground and player-
>
On Sunday, September 04, 2011 17:09:43 Torsten Dreyer wrote:
> Hi Adrian,
>
> this all sounds very interesting and not only for AI Aircraft but also
> for the navigation radios. I am currently refactoring the navradio code
> and I'd really like to have a better propagation model than our current
Am 04.09.2011 14:15, schrieb Adrian Musceac:
> I have started to implement radio signal attenuation into the ATC subsystem,
> with the goal to later move this to it's own location.
> I have chosen the Irregular Terrain Model (ITM) developed by Longley-Rice in
> the 70's for several reasons:
[..]
Hi
6 matches
Mail list logo
