Re: [Flightgear-devel] clouds heads up

2009-11-28 Thread Tim Moore
On 11/28/2009 05:25 AM, Tatsuhiro Nishioka wrote: Hi Tim, As I said to you in IRC, I have a weird transparency problem with the shaders enabled. Here's the snapshot (helicopter view) with shaders. http://macflightgear.sourceforge.net/wp-content/uploads/snapshots/3dclouds-effect-enabled.png

Re: [Flightgear-devel] clouds heads up

2009-11-28 Thread Tatsuhiro Nishioka
Hi, On Nov 28, 2009, at 7:16 PM, Tim Moore wrote: On 11/28/2009 05:25 AM, Tatsuhiro Nishioka wrote: Hi Tim, As I said to you in IRC, I have a weird transparency problem with the shaders enabled. Here's the snapshot (helicopter view) with shaders.

Re: [Flightgear-devel] clouds heads up

2009-11-27 Thread Tatsuhiro Nishioka
Hi Tim, As I said to you in IRC, I have a weird transparency problem with the shaders enabled. Here's the snapshot (helicopter view) with shaders. http://macflightgear.sourceforge.net/wp-content/uploads/snapshots/3dclouds-effect-enabled.png I used both FG/SG @ cvs-head as of yesterday and FG/SG

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Clouds

2009-11-16 Thread Stuart Buchanan
syd adams wrote: Looks good . Yeah maybe the runway lights should go in lighting... Just a thought , what about a 'rendering options' and 'view options' in the main menu , rather than a single view button ? At least lots of room in the view to add my FOV button :) Glad you like it. I'm

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Clouds

2009-11-16 Thread Jacob Burbach
My screenshot didn't show the proposed menu structure, so here it is: View - Display Options - Rendering Options - Cockpit View Options - Adjust View Distance - Adjust HUD Properties - Instant Replay - Adjust LOD Ranges* While we're at it, could Adjust View Distance be changed to Adjust

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Clouds

2009-11-16 Thread Stuart Buchanan
Jacob Burbach wrote: To: FlightGear developers discussions flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net Sent: Mon, 16 November, 2009 11:44:38 Subject: Re: [Flightgear-devel] Clouds My screenshot didn't show the proposed menu structure, so here it is: View - Display Options - Rendering

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Clouds

2009-11-16 Thread syd adams
wrote: To: FlightGear developers discussions flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net Sent: Mon, 16 November, 2009 11:44:38 Subject: Re: [Flightgear-devel] Clouds My screenshot didn't show the proposed menu structure, so here it is: View - Display Options - Rendering Options - Cockpit

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Clouds

2009-11-14 Thread Stuart Buchanan
syd adams wrote: Stuart Buchanan wrote: I have an updated Rendering Options dialog on my home PC which attempts to lay out the rendering options in a more sensible fashion without resorting to another dialog. I'll post a screenshot tonight or tomorrow. OK , I had a feeling I misunderstood your

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Clouds

2009-11-14 Thread syd adams
Looks good . Yeah maybe the runway lights should go in lighting... Just a thought , what about a 'rendering options' and 'view options' in the main menu , rather than a single view button ? At least lots of room in the view to add my FOV button :) On 11/14/09, Stuart Buchanan

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Clouds

2009-11-14 Thread Heiko Schulz
Hi, Looks good . Yeah maybe the runway lights should go in lighting... Just a thought , what about a 'rendering options' and 'view options' in the main menu , rather than a single view button ? At least lots of room in the view to add  my FOV button :) As Tim is now slowly checking in

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Clouds

2009-11-12 Thread Stuart Buchanan
syd adams wrote: My vote is no to a second one , but moving it , possibly. There are many other changes I'd like to make , but need more feedback... I'm with George et al. - the rendering of 3D clouds is conceptually different from the cloud configuration. An alternative would be to have some

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Clouds

2009-11-12 Thread Gijs de Rooy
Stuart Buchanan wrote: In fact, we might want to have some help text there anyway if we're using a weather scenario that means clouds cannot be edited. What about disabling that menu in the case a weather scenario is used? Like the Network menu is disabled when you are not connect to a

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Clouds

2009-11-12 Thread syd adams
OK , I had a feeling I misunderstood your ideas for changes ... I find the hud menu a bit of a problem also , it would be nice to add hud #1 checkbox with a trailing 3D checkbox, hud #2 , etc , but I rarely use the hud , so that's something I could add locally ... I would also like to keep the

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Clouds

2009-11-12 Thread Melchior FRANZ
* syd adams -- Thursday 12 November 2009: it would be nice to add hud #1 checkbox with a trailing 3D checkbox, hud #2 The two HUD implementations weren't meant to coexist so long. The removal of the old HUD and conversion of all aircraft to the newer one is overdue. I only had to implement the

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Clouds

2009-11-12 Thread syd adams
Good to know , I thought there was a reason for having 2 , just didn't know what that reason was :) Cheers On Thu, Nov 12, 2009 at 1:52 PM, Melchior FRANZ mfr...@aon.at wrote: * syd adams -- Thursday 12 November 2009: it would be nice to add hud #1 checkbox with a trailing 3D checkbox, hud

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Clouds

2009-11-11 Thread syd adams
My vote is no to a second one , but moving it , possibly. There are many other changes I'd like to make , but need more feedback... On Wed, Nov 11, 2009 at 6:11 PM, Pete Morgan ac...@daffodil.uk.com wrote: Can the enable 3d clouds Menu View Rendering options 3D Coluds also appear under

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Clouds

2009-11-11 Thread George Patterson
From a end-user perspective, at this point, I'd be vote No to moving and No to the duplicating it. The reason being is that the 3d Clouds option is rendering only and not a weather option. I'd expect similar cloud coverage for both 3d clouds or the older method. Moving the option would mean that

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Clouds

2009-11-11 Thread Ron Jensen
On Thu, 2009-11-12 at 15:35 +1100, George Patterson wrote: From a end-user perspective, at this point, I'd be vote No to moving and No to the duplicating it. The reason being is that the 3d Clouds option is rendering only and not a weather option. I'd expect similar cloud coverage for both