Re: [Flightgear-devel] FlightGear and VATSIM

2006-11-07 Thread Didier Fabert
Le lundi 6 novembre 2006 13:07, Holger Wirtz a écrit : > Hehe, I know what an open source project is because I use Linux and GNU > utils since more than ten years. ;-) > > What I try to adept is the following: > - When I take plenty of my free time and get trouble with my wife and my > children,

Re: [Flightgear-devel] FlightGear and VATSIM

2006-11-06 Thread Martin Spott
Holger Wirtz wrote: > All I want wo avoid is to write code for something that will never be > used because there are plans for connecting to other well known > available services - if they are open source or not. Please let us slow down this topic for a few days as "the FlightGear people at FSWee

Re: [Flightgear-devel] FlightGear and VATSIM

2006-11-06 Thread Holger Wirtz
Didier, On Mon, Nov 06, 2006 at 12:37:37PM +0100, Didier Fabert wrote: > Le lundi 6 novembre 2006 11:43, Holger Wirtz a écrit : > > Ok, I see the problem. But I think it will be difficult to get a big > > community for atc flying and it will be more difficult to build the "same" > > atc applicatio

Re: [Flightgear-devel] FlightGear and VATSIM

2006-11-06 Thread Didier Fabert
Le lundi 6 novembre 2006 11:43, Holger Wirtz a écrit : > Ok, I see the problem. But I think it will be difficult to get a big > community for atc flying and it will be more difficult to build the "same" > atc applications for a new protocol. Maybe a new protocol will be better > and really open - b

Re: [Flightgear-devel] FlightGear and VATSIM

2006-11-06 Thread Holger Wirtz
George, On Mon, Nov 06, 2006 at 08:57:41PM +1030, George Patterson wrote: [...] > > > But there has been some talk about stand-alone bridging software AFAIK. > > > > The background of my question was the following: > > If there are ideas to implement VATSIM I need not to go on to implenent > > so