Re: [Flightgear-devel] GPWS-implementation on the 733 failed- can someone help?

2010-11-30 Thread Scott Hamilton
On Tue, 2010-11-30 at 11:33 +, Heiko Schulz wrote:
 Hi,
 
 I recently implemented the GPWS according to the tutorial: 
 http://wiki.flightgear.org/index.php/GPWS and let it merged into FGdata
 
 
 To my own surprise it isn't working, though I can remember that the same 
 tutorial worked perfectly shortly after fixing of the GPWS.
 
 I tried to fix it and had a look into the 777-200. Though I implemented all 
 subsystems (electrical, instrumentation... it is still not working.
 
 I wonder whats wrong with the 733 in FGdata, obviously I miss something.
 
 Can someone help me?
 
 Thanks
 Heiko


Heiko,


   I'd be interested to hear how this goes, I also implemented
everything according to the Wiki tutorial, I remember it all worked
quite a while ago, but I can't remember the last time I heard it
working...


   scott.


--
Increase Visibility of Your 3D Game App  Earn a Chance To Win $500!
Tap into the largest installed PC base  get more eyes on your game by
optimizing for Intel(R) Graphics Technology. Get started today with the
Intel(R) Software Partner Program. Five $500 cash prizes are up for grabs.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/intelisp-dev2dev
___
Flightgear-devel mailing list
Flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flightgear-devel


Re: [Flightgear-devel] GPWS-implementation on the 733 failed- can someone help?

2010-11-30 Thread James Turner

On 30 Nov 2010, at 12:37, Scott Hamilton wrote:

   I'd be interested to hear how this goes, I also implemented
 everything according to the Wiki tutorial, I remember it all worked
 quite a while ago, but I can't remember the last time I heard it
 working...

Thorsten B has done a huge amount of work on the GPWS in the past few months, 
my impression is that with the latest Git code, it's working better than at any 
point in its history - with the caveat, assuming you have configured it 
correctly!

James


--
Increase Visibility of Your 3D Game App  Earn a Chance To Win $500!
Tap into the largest installed PC base  get more eyes on your game by
optimizing for Intel(R) Graphics Technology. Get started today with the
Intel(R) Software Partner Program. Five $500 cash prizes are up for grabs.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/intelisp-dev2dev
___
Flightgear-devel mailing list
Flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flightgear-devel


Re: [Flightgear-devel] GPWS-implementation on the 733 failed- can someone help?

2010-11-30 Thread Heiko Schulz
Hi
 
 Thorsten B has done a huge amount of work on the GPWS in
 the past few months, my impression is that with the latest
 Git code, it's working better than at any point in its
 history - with the caveat, assuming you have configured it
 correctly!
 
 James

We just followed ThorstenB's wiki tutorial for implementing the GPWS...
And that's our question: it seems something changed, but not in the wiki.
And we are just asking for help to get it working again

Heiko



--
Increase Visibility of Your 3D Game App  Earn a Chance To Win $500!
Tap into the largest installed PC base  get more eyes on your game by
optimizing for Intel(R) Graphics Technology. Get started today with the
Intel(R) Software Partner Program. Five $500 cash prizes are up for grabs.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/intelisp-dev2dev
___
Flightgear-devel mailing list
Flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flightgear-devel


Re: [Flightgear-devel] GPWS-implementation on the 733 failed- can someone help?

2010-11-30 Thread ThorstenB
On Tue, Nov 30, 2010 at 2:14 PM, Heiko Schulz wrote:

 Thorsten B has done a huge amount of work on the GPWS in
 the past few months, my impression is that with the latest
 Git code, it's working better than at any point in its
 history - with the caveat, assuming you have configured it
 correctly!

 James

 We just followed ThorstenB's wiki tutorial for implementing the GPWS...
 And that's our question: it seems something changed, but not in the wiki.
 And we are just asking for help to get it working again

Yes, I kind of adopted the GPWS. And there haven't been any recent
changes, so the wiki description should still be correct (unless there
was a mistake from the beginning...).
Have you tested the GPWS with the latest 777-200 (in GIT since
Sunday)? It's definitely working there. If it wasn't working for you,
then we need to look at some FG problem (like the recent sound or
directory access issues). If the 777 GPWS is working for you, then
it's related to aircraft configuration. I'll be testing and looking at
the 733.

And those interested in a full-blown GPWS integration could check the
777-200 now. It has a new gpws Nasal wrapper to provide functionality
like flap-, gear- and G/S-override buttons. It also shows how to allow
lower flap settings for landing (by default, the GPWS requires full
flap extension), connection of the master warning light, and how to
connect the PFD, i.e. to display the PULL UP TCW (time critical
warning).

Admittedly, the GPWS in FlightGear is a bit complicated. The main
reason is that the original author chose to simulate an actual
hardware device (a specific type made by Honeywell). All inputs and
outputs match the real counterpart - even the binary encoding of
digital I/O. And yes, the configuration parameters (category-1...) are
also identical to the real device. It just doesn't get any more
realistic than this. But while this may make integration/configuration
a bit more complicated than usual, I still think his work is really
great.
And remember about FlightGear: it's not a game - it's a real sim! :)

cheers,
Thorsten

--
Increase Visibility of Your 3D Game App  Earn a Chance To Win $500!
Tap into the largest installed PC base  get more eyes on your game by
optimizing for Intel(R) Graphics Technology. Get started today with the
Intel(R) Software Partner Program. Five $500 cash prizes are up for grabs.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/intelisp-dev2dev
___
Flightgear-devel mailing list
Flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flightgear-devel


Re: [Flightgear-devel] GPWS-implementation on the 733 failed- can someone help?

2010-11-30 Thread Heiko Schulz
Hi ThorstenB,

 
 Yes, I kind of adopted the GPWS. And there haven't been any
 recent
 changes, so the wiki description should still be correct
 (unless there
 was a mistake from the beginning...).

I tried it shortly after you finished the tutorial and it worked perfect.
Now it stopped working...

 Have you tested the GPWS with the latest 777-200 (in GIT
 since
 Sunday)? It's definitely working there. If it wasn't
 working for you,
 then we need to look at some FG problem (like the recent
 sound or
 directory access issues). If the 777 GPWS is working for
 you, then
 it's related to aircraft configuration. I'll be testing and
 looking at
 the 733.

The 777-200 is working perfect in every aspects. Thanks for! 
I had a look into, even ported the related subsystems over to the 733, but no 
success.

Scott (working on the A380) noticed the same with the wiki-tutorial and the 
GPWS. Interesting to know and maybe a hint: A380 and 733 are both JSBsim. 
 

 
 Admittedly, the GPWS in FlightGear is a bit complicated.
 The main
 reason is that the original author chose to simulate an
 actual
 hardware device (a specific type made by Honeywell). All
 inputs and
 outputs match the real counterpart - even the binary
 encoding of
 digital I/O. And yes, the configuration parameters
 (category-1...) are
 also identical to the real device. It just doesn't get any
 more
 realistic than this. But while this may make
 integration/configuration
 a bit more complicated than usual, I still think his work
 is really
 great.
 And remember about FlightGear: it's not a game - it's a
 real sim! :)

Yep, great work. Maybe because ARINC uses (or used?) FlightGear for 
developement?

Thanks
Heiko



--
Increase Visibility of Your 3D Game App  Earn a Chance To Win $500!
Tap into the largest installed PC base  get more eyes on your game by
optimizing for Intel(R) Graphics Technology. Get started today with the
Intel(R) Software Partner Program. Five $500 cash prizes are up for grabs.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/intelisp-dev2dev
___
Flightgear-devel mailing list
Flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flightgear-devel


Re: [Flightgear-devel] GPWS-implementation on the 733 failed- can someone help?

2010-11-30 Thread ThorstenB
On Tue, Nov 30, 2010 at 7:54 PM, Heiko Schulz wrote:

 I had a look into, even ported the related subsystems over to the 733, but no 
 success.

 Scott (working on the A380) noticed the same with the wiki-tutorial and the 
 GPWS. Interesting to know and maybe a hint: A380 and 733 are both JSBsim.

Right, that is related to the problem. Depending on configuration the
GPWS relies on a specific altitude source which is only available for
YASim right now.
You could switch the category-8 parameter to 3 (instead of 2) -
and the GPWS will work with JSBSim and other FDMs. However, please
wait before pushing any ac changes, since this solution isn't good
enough.
The point here is that the GPWS needs a pretty accurate altimeter
source for main-gear-above-ground-level, otherwise the important final
callouts 20.10 make no sense. Since there is no such FDM
source (except for YASim) we'll need to hook it to the radio altimeter
instrument - which isn't available as a GPWS default source yet. I'll
be changing and testing something here - and hopefully push something
later this week (also a Wiki update, if required).
Thanks for the report!

And to reiterate: everyone, please report if you notice something
wasn't working. Just add something to the tracker. Yes, reports there
are monitored and bugs fixed (eventually) - even if some issues cannot
be fixed on the same day :).

cheers,
Thorsten

--
Increase Visibility of Your 3D Game App  Earn a Chance To Win $500!
Tap into the largest installed PC base  get more eyes on your game by
optimizing for Intel(R) Graphics Technology. Get started today with the
Intel(R) Software Partner Program. Five $500 cash prizes are up for grabs.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/intelisp-dev2dev
___
Flightgear-devel mailing list
Flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flightgear-devel


Re: [Flightgear-devel] GPWS-implementation on the 733 failed- can someone help?

2010-11-30 Thread Victhor
Last time I used the radar-altimeter instrument it took too much time
IMO to update.
 On Tue, Nov 30, 2010 at 7:54 PM, Heiko Schulz wrote:
 
  I had a look into, even ported the related subsystems over to the 733, but 
  no success.
 
  Scott (working on the A380) noticed the same with the wiki-tutorial and the 
  GPWS. Interesting to know and maybe a hint: A380 and 733 are both JSBsim.
 
 Right, that is related to the problem. Depending on configuration the
 GPWS relies on a specific altitude source which is only available for
 YASim right now.
 You could switch the category-8 parameter to 3 (instead of 2) -
 and the GPWS will work with JSBSim and other FDMs. However, please
 wait before pushing any ac changes, since this solution isn't good
 enough.
 The point here is that the GPWS needs a pretty accurate altimeter
 source for main-gear-above-ground-level, otherwise the important final
 callouts 20.10 make no sense. Since there is no such FDM
 source (except for YASim) we'll need to hook it to the radio altimeter
 instrument - which isn't available as a GPWS default source yet. I'll
 be changing and testing something here - and hopefully push something
 later this week (also a Wiki update, if required).
 Thanks for the report!
 
 And to reiterate: everyone, please report if you notice something
 wasn't working. Just add something to the tracker. Yes, reports there
 are monitored and bugs fixed (eventually) - even if some issues cannot
 be fixed on the same day :).
 
 cheers,
 Thorsten
 
 --
 Increase Visibility of Your 3D Game App  Earn a Chance To Win $500!
 Tap into the largest installed PC base  get more eyes on your game by
 optimizing for Intel(R) Graphics Technology. Get started today with the
 Intel(R) Software Partner Program. Five $500 cash prizes are up for grabs.
 http://p.sf.net/sfu/intelisp-dev2dev
 ___
 Flightgear-devel mailing list
 Flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
 https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flightgear-devel



--
Increase Visibility of Your 3D Game App  Earn a Chance To Win $500!
Tap into the largest installed PC base  get more eyes on your game by
optimizing for Intel(R) Graphics Technology. Get started today with the
Intel(R) Software Partner Program. Five $500 cash prizes are up for grabs.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/intelisp-dev2dev
___
Flightgear-devel mailing list
Flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flightgear-devel


Re: [Flightgear-devel] GPWS-implementation on the 733 failed- can someone help?

2010-11-30 Thread Heiko Schulz
Hi,
 
 Right, that is related to the problem. Depending on
 configuration the
 GPWS relies on a specific altitude source which is only
 available for
 YASim right now.
 You could switch the category-8 parameter to 3
 (instead of 2) -
 and the GPWS will work with JSBSim and other FDMs. 

Yep, does work again...

 However,
 please
 wait before pushing any ac changes, since this solution
 isn't good
 enough.
 The point here is that the GPWS needs a pretty accurate
 altimeter
 source for main-gear-above-ground-level, otherwise the
 important final
 callouts 20.10 make no sense. Since there is no
 such FDM
 source (except for YASim) we'll need to hook it to the
 radio altimeter
 instrument - which isn't available as a GPWS default source
 yet. 

As this is a pretty accurate emulation of the real thing (or maybe it is even 
the real thing.. ;-)), how it gets its datas in real life? What is the source 
in reallife? 

 
 And to reiterate: everyone, please report if you notice
 something
 wasn't working. Just add something to the tracker. Yes,
 reports there
 are monitored and bugs fixed (eventually) - even if some
 issues cannot
 be fixed on the same day :).

We had this now several times now here on the list. 
My thought about this is before I report a bug to the bug-tracker, I want to 
know first if the bug isn't sitting in front of the pc.;-)

Heiko



--
Increase Visibility of Your 3D Game App  Earn a Chance To Win $500!
Tap into the largest installed PC base  get more eyes on your game by
optimizing for Intel(R) Graphics Technology. Get started today with the
Intel(R) Software Partner Program. Five $500 cash prizes are up for grabs.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/intelisp-dev2dev
___
Flightgear-devel mailing list
Flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flightgear-devel


Re: [Flightgear-devel] GPWS-implementation on the 733 failed- can someone help?

2010-11-30 Thread James Turner

On 30 Nov 2010, at 21:55, Heiko Schulz wrote:

 We had this now several times now here on the list. 
 My thought about this is before I report a bug to the bug-tracker, I want to 
 know first if the bug isn't sitting in front of the pc.;-)

It's much better to create a bug, and have it closed 30 minutes later because 
the error was with the user, than to wait days or weeks to file a real bug. 
Closing or merging bugs is easy.

Of course, more people to look over the bugs, test them and update them, is 
always welcome too!

James


--
Increase Visibility of Your 3D Game App  Earn a Chance To Win $500!
Tap into the largest installed PC base  get more eyes on your game by
optimizing for Intel(R) Graphics Technology. Get started today with the
Intel(R) Software Partner Program. Five $500 cash prizes are up for grabs.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/intelisp-dev2dev
___
Flightgear-devel mailing list
Flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flightgear-devel


Re: [Flightgear-devel] GPWS-implementation on the 733 failed- can someone help?

2010-11-30 Thread ThorstenB
On Tue, Nov 30, 2010 at 10:55 PM, Heiko Schulz wrote:

 As this is a pretty accurate emulation of the real thing (or maybe it is even 
 the real thing.. ;-)), how it gets its datas in real life? What is the source 
 in reallife?
The RL device may be configured to a number of radio altimeters -
connecting to its analogue or digitial (ARINC) inputs.
Anyone interested in designing a RL DIY radio altimeter may find this
helpful. :)
http://lea.hamradio.si/~s53mv/radalt/radalt.html

On Tue, Nov 30, 2010 at 10:28 PM, Victhor wrote:
 Last time I used the radar-altimeter instrument it took too much time
 IMO to update.
It doesn't seem too bad now. And the update frequency is configurable
- and a very limited update frequency is enough to drive the GPWS. And
I'll add more options to select/configure the altimeter source...

cheers,
Thorsten

--
Increase Visibility of Your 3D Game App  Earn a Chance To Win $500!
Tap into the largest installed PC base  get more eyes on your game by
optimizing for Intel(R) Graphics Technology. Get started today with the
Intel(R) Software Partner Program. Five $500 cash prizes are up for grabs.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/intelisp-dev2dev
___
Flightgear-devel mailing list
Flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flightgear-devel