On Friday 14 Oct 2005 23:50, Buchanan, Stuart wrote:
It took a bit longer than I expected, but I've now
finished a cross-country tutorial from KRHV to KLVK.
Take a look here:
http://www.nanjika.co.uk/flightgear/tutorial.html
The idea is to provide a follow-on from Eric's
tutorial
AJ MacLeod wrote:
That looks really excellent! Finally we have two cohesive tutorials to point
complete flying newbies to that are written with FG in mind (there are a
reasonable number of these folk turn up on the IRC channel now and again)
Actually, we have three (at least0. In the Docs
Erik Hofman wrote:
Actually, we have three (at least).
Actually, there's four:
http://www.flightgear.org/Docs/Tutorials/circuit/
Erik
___
Flightgear-users mailing list
Flightgear-users@flightgear.org
On Saturday 15 Oct 2005 10:01, Erik Hofman wrote:
Erik Hofman wrote:
Actually, we have three (at least).
Actually, there's four:
http://www.flightgear.org/Docs/Tutorials/circuit/
Erik
In my opinion, the more tutorials the better. Particularly if they
are written by different people, and
On Sat, 15 Oct 2005 10:49:52 +0200, Erik Hofman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Would it be possible to combine these documents somehow to get to one
comprehensive manual, preferably in PDF format?
NOOO! not more pdf!
pdf is closed , proprietary difficult to modify, huge and generally bad.
it
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
NOOO! not more pdf!
pdf is closed , proprietary difficult to modify, huge and generally bad.
So what do you suggest as a cross-platform alternative?
(And don't mention OpenOffice since it hasn't been ported to many
platforms and is way overkill for just reading
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Sorry, but you are wrong
[EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb:
pdf is closed , proprietary difficult to modify, huge and generally bad.
PDF is an standard, there are even 2 different ISO standards now (one
for professional printing and one for archiving it,
On Saturday 15 Oct 2005 10:37, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sat, 15 Oct 2005 10:49:52 +0200, Erik Hofman [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Would it be possible to combine these documents somehow to get
to one comprehensive manual, preferably in PDF format?
NOOO! not more pdf!
pdf is good for
Christian Mayer schrieb:
...
Generally bad is totally wrong. It is generally good... ;)
In AcrobatReader it displays for me (under Windows) much nicer than e.g.
GhostView. And it definitely has search ability and hyperlinking.
m2c, please check your sources before you make such strong
Le samedi 15 octobre 2005 à 11:37 +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] a écrit :
On Sat, 15 Oct 2005 10:49:52 +0200, Erik Hofman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Would it be possible to combine these documents somehow to get to one
comprehensive manual, preferably in PDF format?
NOOO! not more pdf!
For a while now the T-38 has been set up as an air refueling, AI tanker,
air-air radar demonstrator, even though the real T-38 doesn't have radar or
air refueling capability. I'd like to return the T-38 to stock condition
and let some other aircraft take over as radar and air refueling
Le samedi 15 octobre 2005 à 07:59 -0500, Dave Culp a écrit :
For a while now the T-38 has been set up as an air refueling, AI tanker,
air-air radar demonstrator, even though the real T-38 doesn't have radar or
air refueling capability. I'd like to return the T-38 to stock condition
and let
1) Is any other aircraft in FlightGear's hangar using any of these
capabilities right now?
Air refueling Yes. Crusader (not yet in the hangar) ask for it.
Would it be a good idea to add a tanker, say an A-6 Intruder to the aircraft
carrier scenario? We could set it up in an orbit over
Le samedi 15 octobre 2005 à 08:12 -0500, Dave Culp a écrit :
1) Is any other aircraft in FlightGear's hangar using any of these
capabilities right now?
Air refueling Yes. Crusader (not yet in the hangar) ask for it.
Would it be a good idea to add a tanker, say an A-6 Intruder to the
Dave Culp wrote:
Would it be a good idea to add a tanker, say an A-6 Intruder to the aircraft
carrier scenario? We could set it up in an orbit over the carrier at 5000
feet.
Actually, this triggers something else I've been thinking of.
Right now all scenario's take place at KSFO. If we
Tutorial appears to be great, just starting to read it. Now a
question on radio's which I have ignored to this point. How do you tune
them with a two button mouse and/or a laptop touch pad?
Ray McNeice
___
Flightgear-users mailing list
Gerard ROBIN wrote:
Right, we cannot get the good scenario according to the place we are.
I don't use AI surrounding KSFO, instead of it i did create some AI:
Helicopter (bo105 hello Melchior) flying over mont Ventoux and Nimitz
Cruising in mediterranean Sea not far from Nice (from Nice we
Le samedi 15 octobre 2005 à 16:08 +0200, Erik Hofman a écrit :
Gerard ROBIN wrote:
Right, we cannot get the good scenario according to the place we are.
I don't use AI surrounding KSFO, instead of it i did create some AI:
Helicopter (bo105 hello Melchior) flying over mont Ventoux and
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Georg Vollnhals schrieb:
Christian Mayer schrieb:
...
Generally bad is totally wrong. It is generally good... ;)
But what Christian tells in a very absolute way does *not* match my
experiences.
I hope you noticed my ;) there... :)
1.
On the missed approach - apply full power and when
you have a positive
rate of climb (to avoid loss of height), retract
flaps. Climb out should
also be on the dead side, climb to circuit height
and turn to rejoin the
circuit pattern.
Regards
Sid.
Thanks for the information Sid. I've
On Freitag 14 Oktober 2005 10:40, Erik Hofman wrote:
Just as a heads up, Mathias has sent me a patch containing a number of
memory leak fixes that where tracked down by valgrind. I hope I can
commit it later today.
Hmm, there were additional ones which are now plugged in todays cvs.
I believe
On the missed approach - apply full power and when you have a positive
rate of climb (to avoid loss of height), retract flaps.
Also, please rename it from the missed approach to go-around ---
missed approach is an IFR term. BTW, go-around is what you'll
get on the ' menu as well.
V.
It used to be working... i don't know what happenned in between but now i
get a segmentation fault as i run fgfs.
I do not understand the meaning of the error. Can some one help?
To trace, i ran fgfs through gdb and here is the output.
On Saturday 15 October 2005 13:59, Dave Culp wrote:
For a while now the T-38 has been set up as an air refueling, AI tanker,
air-air radar demonstrator, even though the real T-38 doesn't have radar or
air refueling capability.
2) Is anyone interested in this sort of thing?
Very much so on
Hi all,
I'm having trouble with the autopilot using a couple of days old CVS
version on Windows XP . I am attempting to follow the recently posted
tutorial for VFR flight, but I am unable to operate the autopilot
correctly. enabling the autopilot with ctrl+h does not work, and when
clicking
Hi, after take-off any aircraft I use banks to the left (except the
Beech1900.)
Adjusting my .fgfsrc does not change this. Anyone who knows how to correct
this? This is not like the normal behaviour (right rudder when applying
power). When using the rudder the AC just start to 'slip' (nose
The reason to push on with using pdf as one of the
preferred formats is
that generating a table of contents/index is
doable. I have seen web
pages cut in half by browsers and you can't
guarantee the position of an
image when printed.
PDFs rock for printing, HTML for reading off
On Saturday 15 October 2005 20:09, Kitts wrote:
I do not understand the meaning of the error. Can some one help?
freeglut (/home/Kishore/KDevelop/FlightGear/source/src/Main/fgfs): Failed
to create cursor
You're not using freeglut 2.4 by any chance?
AJ
That looks really excellent! Finally we have two
cohesive tutorials to point
complete flying newbies to that are written with FG
in mind (there are a
reasonable number of these folk turn up on the IRC
channel now and again)
Thanks. Hope it will be of use. It's difficult to
decide who
On Saturday 15 October 2005 21:59, Kitts wrote:
Yes! I am using freeglut3 version 2.4.
It appears there is a bug in freeglut 2.4 which as far as I can see has been
fixed in freeglut CVS. I've not tried 2.4 myself, 2.2 is what I use and it
works. I just ended up looking into that problem when
Would it be a good idea to add a tanker, say an A-6 Intruder to the
aircraft carrier scenario? We could set it up in an orbit over the
carrier at 5000 feet.
Yes that idea is great, who has time to do it ?
Intruder is a a very interesting aircraft.
I'm only interested in a low-poly
On Sat, 15 Oct 2005 18:25:32 +0200, Mathias Fröhlich
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Freitag 14 Oktober 2005 10:40, Erik Hofman wrote:
Just as a heads up, Mathias has sent me a patch containing a number of
memory leak fixes that where tracked down by valgrind. I hope I can
commit it later today.
Hi, after take-off any aircraft I use banks to the left (except the
Beech1900.)
Adjusting my .fgfsrc does not change this. Anyone who knows how to correct
this? This is not like the normal behaviour (right rudder when applying
power). When using the rudder the AC just start to 'slip' (nose
On Sunday 16 Oct 2005 2:45 am IST, AJ MacLeod wrote:
AM It appears there is a bug in freeglut 2.4 which as far as I can see has
been
AM fixed in freeglut CVS. I've not tried 2.4 myself, 2.2 is what I use and
it
AM works. I just ended up looking into that problem when several people in
AM
Le samedi 15 octobre 2005 à 16:19 -0500, Dave Culp a écrit :
Would it be a good idea to add a tanker, say an A-6 Intruder to the
aircraft carrier scenario? We could set it up in an orbit over the
carrier at 5000 feet.
Yes that idea is great, who has time to do it ?
Intruder is a a
On Sat, 15 Oct 2005 21:43:18 +0200, Roos, wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Hi, after take-off any aircraft I use banks to the left (except the
Beech1900.)
..weird. It too should bank left, (or does it play the P-38 kinda
games turning its 2 props both ways to cancel the torque?)
On Sat, 15 Oct 2005 22:03:05 +0100 (BST), Buchanan, wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
That looks really excellent! Finally we have two
cohesive tutorials to point
complete flying newbies to that are written with FG
in mind (there are a
reasonable number of these folk turn up on
On Sat, 2005-10-15 at 16:19 -0500, Dave Culp wrote:
I'm only interested in a low-poly model to use as an AI tanker. Here's an
FS98 model I picked up from simviation. It's too coarse to be interesting as
a user model, but it's fine for AI:
On Sun, 16 Oct 2005 00:11:45 +0100, David wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Buchanan, Stuart writes:
Would it be worth adding it to the CVS? I'm quite
happy to GFDL it, but one of the images includes a
grab from a sectional.
..precisely how does it include a grab from a sectional?
I'll add a drogue and hose, paint it gray, then try to get permission
from the author so we can GPL it.
I might be better to get permission first so you are not spending large
amounts of time for little gain.
Too late :)
http://home.comcast.net/~davidculp2/F8_KA6.jpg
I'll use it for
Buchanan, Stuart wrote:
On the missed approach - apply full power and when
you have a positive
rate of climb (to avoid loss of height), retract
flaps. Climb out should
also be on the dead side, climb to circuit height
and turn to rejoin the
circuit pattern.
Regards
Sid.
Thanks for the
George Patterson [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Whats the airport just forward of the F8's right wing tip? (Assuming
it is an airport :-/)
i think that's half moon bay airport (KHAF).
--alex--
--
| I believe the moment is at hand when, by a paranoiac and active |
| advance of the mind, it will
42 matches
Mail list logo
