Hello:
Can multiplayer be undertaken on Windows, as there was an earlier thread
discussing cvs etc?
Thank You
Martin
___
Flightgear-users mailing list
Flightgear-users@flightgear.org
http://mail.flightgear.org/mailman/listinfo/flightgear-users
Martin
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:flightgear-users-
[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of MPCEE French Bureau
Sent: 04 December 2005 09:57
To: user discussions FlightGear
Subject: [Flightgear-users] multiplayer screenshot
Hello:
Can multiplayer be undertaken
Selon Vivian Meazza :
However, FGRun is a little out-of-date. Use Advanced/Networks to set the
parameters, not multiplayer on the initial page. If you are using a command
line interface follow the instructions.
What's wrong/missing in fgrun ?
-Fred
Le samedi 03 décembre 2005 à 11:04 +1300, dene maxwell a écrit :
Thanks for that.
I have looked around for the FGSD win32 executable, I found the source
Thank you Fred,
The download numbers were interesting, would suggest win32 is a more popular
platform than I was led to believe ;-
Hello Vivian:
A superb afternoon with multiplayer! Should the frame rate drop as the
numbers of players join in?
Thank You
Martin
-Original Message-
From: Vivian Meazza [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, December 04, 2005 11:45 AM
To: 'FlightGear user discussions'
Subject: RE:
Martin
Hello Vivian:
A superb afternoon with multiplayer! Should the frame rate drop as the
numbers of players join in?
I wish I could say 'no', but the fact is that it does. You will see a marked
drop in frame rate as someone joins, then it will go up again after they are
initialised,
Fred
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:flightgear-users-
[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Frederic Bouvier
Sent: 04 December 2005 11:36
To: FlightGear user discussions
Subject: RE: [Flightgear-users] multiplayer screenshot
Selon Vivian Meazza :
However, FGRun is
Hello,
Here a double snapshot which makes me to ask that question:
which is the most realistic one?
I guess it is that one without 3D clouds.
If yes, is it possible to get a better result with 3D Clouds ? (density
was default 100%)
http://ghours.club.fr/Rain-Vs-Clouds.jpg
Cheers
--
Gerard
the real host name. Could you
tell me if it works for you ?
ftp://ftp.ihg.uni-duisburg.de/FlightGear/Win32/fgrun-win32-20051204.zip
-Fred
___
Flightgear-users mailing list
Flightgear-users@flightgear.org
http://mail.flightgear.org/mailman/listinfo
In my opinion..rain without 3D clouds is more realistic.
- Original Message -
From: Gerard ROBIN [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: FlightGear user discussions flightgear-users@flightgear.org
Sent: Sunday, December 04, 2005 5:06 PM
Subject: [Flightgear-users] 3D Clouds or Not 3D Clouds (When it is
On December 4, 2005 01:38 pm, Vivian Meazza wrote:
I wish I could say 'no', but the fact is that it does. You will see a
marked drop in frame rate as someone joins, then it will go up again after
they are initialised, but not to the original rate. I'd like to think that
could be handles
by retrieving the real host name. Could you
tell me if it works for you ?
ftp://ftp.ihg.uni-duisburg.de/FlightGear/Win32/fgrun-win32-20051204.zip
Hmmm, not consistently. I expected to be able to put the hostname= to, say,
pigeond.net, the in port to 5000 and out to 5002. In which case
Ampere
On December 4, 2005 01:38 pm, Vivian Meazza wrote:
I wish I could say 'no', but the fact is that it does. You will see a
marked drop in frame rate as someone joins, then it will go up again
after
they are initialised, but not to the original rate. I'd like to think
that
could
13 matches
Mail list logo
