Re: [fltk.development] Fltk-1.3 build warnings on win32

2011-01-10 Thread MacArthur, Ian (SELEX GALILEO, UK)
I just committed r 8210 that fixed a type mismatch, could you please check r 8210 or a later version, or did you use this already? Compiling screen_xywh.cxx is silent for me on r8236. SELEX Galileo Ltd Registered Office: Sigma House, Christopher Martin Road, Basildon, Essex SS14 3EL A

Re: [fltk.development] FLTK 1.3.0 RC 3 is out

2011-01-10 Thread MacArthur, Ian (SELEX GALILEO, UK)
The developer team is proud to announce the release of FLTK 1.3.0, Release Candidate 3 Testing on my old standard (Msys/mingw setup on XP) this builds without any warnings and appears to function OK. Note that this configuration uses a pretty old gcc (3.4.2) and the more recent configs

Re: [fltk.development] FLTK 1.3.0 RC 3 is out

2011-01-10 Thread Matthias Melcher
On 10.01.2011, at 11:03, MacArthur, Ian (SELEX GALILEO, UK) wrote: I can't do the docs, it's awkward time for me, and anyway I'm afraid of doxygen...! Go into documentation/ and look at the .dox . One of those files contain the text that you'd like to have change in ASCII. Just use your

Re: [fltk.development] FLTK 1.3.0 RC 3 is out

2011-01-10 Thread MacArthur, Ian (SELEX GALILEO, UK)
Go into documentation/ and look at the .dox . One of those files contain the text that you'd like to have change in ASCII. Just use your regular programming editor to change it to whatever you think is better. Commit it and I will bring it into the right Doxygen format for you. Matt,

[fltk.development] Doc file missing from RC3 tarball

2011-01-10 Thread Brian Tilley
Just thought you should know that the file main.html is missing from the RC3 documentation tarball. ___ fltk-dev mailing list fltk-dev@easysw.com http://lists.easysw.com/mailman/listinfo/fltk-dev

Re: [fltk.development] Doc file missing from RC3 tarball

2011-01-10 Thread MacArthur, Ian (SELEX GALILEO, UK)
Just thought you should know that the file main.html is missing from the RC3 documentation tarball. Yes - this one is a puzzle to me: - In the fltk-1.1 docs, the entry point was index.html. - in the 1.3-rc2 tarball docs the entry point was main.html. - in the 1.3-rc3 tarball docs the entry

Re: [fltk.development] Doc file missing from RC3 tarball

2011-01-10 Thread Albrecht Schlosser
MacArthur, Ian (SELEX GALILEO, UK) wrote: Just thought you should know that the file main.html is missing from the RC3 documentation tarball. Yes - this one is a puzzle to me: - In the fltk-1.1 docs, the entry point was index.html. - in the 1.3-rc2 tarball docs the entry point was

Re: [fltk.development] FLTK 1.3.0 RC 3 released!

2011-01-10 Thread Boris Mayer-St-Onge
Hi, I did some test on Fedora 10 and 14 with current svn(8241). No major problem. Here are some suggestions: 1- When compiling fltk, at the end one have === making documentation === Formatting src/fltk.man... 5 mores man files Suggestion: change to === making man pages ===. For me, making

Re: [fltk.development] Doc file missing from RC3 tarball

2011-01-10 Thread Greg Ercolano
Albrecht Schlosser wrote: MacArthur, Ian (SELEX GALILEO, UK) wrote: Just thought you should know that the file main.html is missing from the RC3 documentation tarball. I'm just wondering, as I assume this is about the help demo bringing up our html docs. I haven't

Re: [fltk.development] Doc file missing from RC3 tarball

2011-01-10 Thread imacart...@gmail.com
On 10/01/11 20:42, Greg Ercolano wrote: I haven't tried this myself, but can the FLTK html viewer even show our doxygen docs correctly? Short answer: Not it can not. Neither the frames or the non-frames versions of the RC2 docs display correctly with the fltk help_viewer demo.

Re: [fltk.development] Doc file missing from RC3 tarball

2011-01-10 Thread Matthias Melcher
On 10.01.2011, at 22:14, imacart...@gmail.com wrote: On 10/01/11 20:42, Greg Ercolano wrote: I haven't tried this myself, but can the FLTK html viewer even show our doxygen docs correctly? Short answer: Not it can not. Can we make some silly test page then?

Re: [fltk.development] Doc file missing from RC3 tarball

2011-01-10 Thread Greg Ercolano
Matthias Melcher wrote: On 10.01.2011, at 22:14, imacart...@gmail.com wrote: On 10/01/11 20:42, Greg Ercolano wrote: I haven't tried this myself, but can the FLTK html viewer even show our doxygen docs correctly? Short answer: Not it can not. Can we make some silly test page

[fltk.development] Fl_X not exported on mac in 1.3

2011-01-10 Thread Evan Laforge
I just updated to the head of 1.3, and my app failed to compile, complaining that Fl_X was undefined. Looking at FL/mac.H, it looks like it's intentionally hidden when compiling against an application. Hiding system specific stuff seems like a good idea, but it looks like this is inconsistent