On 27.12.2010 18:28, Matthias Melcher wrote:
Well, I knew that not everything would be 100% for RC1, so if you'd please
repack and commit it?
I put an updated PDF file in subversion, updated the dependencies,
and I also uploaded the current docs to the web site. I'll leave
packing rc2 to you,
On a related note - what to do about the html_view demo in the test
folder, and about fluid?
Both attempt to load the html version of the fltk docs, but on many
platforms now with 1.3, these html files will not exist at all.
Albrecht's suggestion of offering a docs tarball would go some way to
It seems the main issue with the main distro is to avoid redundant docs.
If we package either the PDF or HTML along with the doxygen
documentation/src dir, there's redundant data for the images.
(html, pdf, and documentation/src each have their own copy of images)
So it seems to make sense to
So adding my 2 cents, I can see a few scenarios with the above in mind:
1) Old fashioned main distro.
Pre-built html docs only, separate developer-docs distro.
2) Light main distro with separate docs.
No local docs at all with source. index.html refers to
On 27.12.2010, at 21:27, Yuri P. Fedorchenko wrote:
I think that the best way will be include only doxygen docs src in distro
fltk-x.x.x-src.tar.bz2
and make separete html and pdf docs packeges.
fltk-x.x.x-html-doc.tar.bz2
fltk-x.x.x-pfd.tar.bz2
or you favarite archive format.
+1, I
On 27.12.2010, at 19:41, Albrecht Schlosser wrote:
On 27.12.2010 18:28, Matthias Melcher wrote:
Well, I knew that not everything would be 100% for RC1, so if you'd please
repack and commit it?
I put an updated PDF file in subversion, updated the dependencies,
and I also uploaded the
