So - what is/ was genius 2000?
I (and probably a lot of others)
haven't a clue what anyone's been talking about on this topic these last few
weeks
XXX
Roger
Hi Roger and all,
So - what is/ was genius 2000?
It and its creator were the cause of serious flames and tensions on Fluxlist
in the summer of 1999. Mainly because the list was constantly bombarded with
information about it. Nevertheless it was single-handedly responsible for
the need to create
Lag bin
Napkin faucet in yr sobaco
place redemption clambs yr hat
tobacco udder nape of sleet
trouble walking some songed lacquer
feet twinkled in the stone
luster matter stuck in meat
phone. yr posit slant, mode
under, lank your tome thrown
lode impaction seeps, wiped yr
mouse, sock lost in
High, dear Fluxlisters!
On Wed, 11 Jul 2001, ann klefstad wrote:
Low. Genius 2000 was totally, completely, boring, rude, nonconstructive,
confrontational, one-note, just like all of your posts tend to be. Your
obligatory cuteness (High! Hugh!) is embarrassing, the content of the
messages
Hi all,
In writing my last posts I checked the page references at the Fluxlist
archive. While I was there I re-read what we were doing/chatting about a
couple of years ago. Seems a lot of people haven't spoken on this list in
over a year..or they've just lefta shame really...but as always we
Eric Andersen writes:
And rotate list owners. For the next 6 months let's appoint brad brace.
Bukoff and the rest to step down.
I just finished reading Rationalizing Culture, a sociological look at the French
IRCAM music research center. During 1984, one of the departments decided that they
Tamas wrote:
If the Fluxlisters majority will vote YES,
then we shall vote about the voting about
the exclusion of ann klefstad.
My response:
Dear Tamas and Eric,
There is no question of excluding Ann from the list!
I personally have had enough of your tedious agitation on this list. For two
I'm with you, Sol!
Thanks,
John
At 04:27 PM 7/12/01 +0100, you wrote:
Tamas wrote:
If the Fluxlisters majority will vote YES,
then we shall vote about the voting about
the exclusion of ann klefstad.
My response:
Dear Tamas and Eric,
There is no question of excluding Ann from the list!
I
At 04:27 PM 7/12/01 +0100, you wrote:
I apologise to anyone who has just joined the list as it may seem at the
moment that being on this list is somewhat of a waste of time. Please rest
assured that this list has a good culture that is only occasionally
compromised as is occurring at the moment.
Dear John,
At 11:26 PM 7/11/01, you wrote:
Low. Genius 2000 was totally, completely, boring, rude, nonconstructive,
confrontational, one-note, just like all of your posts tend to be.
This is so untrue! It wasn't.
Your
obligatory cuteness (High! Hugh!) is embarrassing, the
Hi all,
I would like to know people's experience of encountering art on the web that
broadly follows a principle of musicality in terms of score-based visual
art.
I'll let you know why later, some things I'm aware of but I'm hoping you can
tell me of things I've not seen, plenty of URLs
My goodness! Such an uproar!
I get the feeling I'm the only one who thinks Eric and Tamas are funny. And
I don't mean that ironically. More to the point, I believe they are very
much aware that they're being funny. Everyone always responds to their
posts which such dead earnestness...aincha
Hiya, Sol:
I know what 'ur takin' 'bout, but I don't bookmark
anything, but maybe this may lead you in a direction:
http://rhythmiclight.com/archives/ideas/correspondences.html
_§+
--
~
adj. gracile
(pr. gras-eel) 1. Gracefully slender. 2. (rare) Graceful
[Latin `gracilis' -
slim,
High, dear Fluxlisters!
IPUT suggests:
let's vote:
Should the Fluxlisters vote about this subject:
Should be IPUT excluded from the Fluxlist?
Delete
YESorNO
If the Fluxlisters majority will vote YES,
then we shall vote about the voting about
the exclusion of IPUT.
ooops
if we'll have an election period here
we must have an election campaing previous or not?
maybe we have an other genius 2000
or similar god in campaing again?
pez
De: St.Auby Tamas [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Responder a: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Fecha: Thu, 12 Jul 2001 13:44:32 +0200
Para: [EMAIL
15 matches
Mail list logo