At 04:27 PM 7/12/01 +0100, you wrote: >I apologise to anyone who has just joined the list as it may seem at the >moment that being on this list is somewhat of a waste of time. Please rest >assured that this list has a good culture that is only occasionally >compromised as is occurring at the moment. I've been here only a few months and can attest, as a relatively new person, that this is one of the most unique and fascinating lists I've ever encountered. This recent volley will surely pass. Hang in all newcomers. It's worth the wait. Deborah
- Re: FLUXLIST: test x John Blower
- FLUXLIST: archive re-minds Sol Nte
- Re: FLUXLIST: test x Losonczi J�lia
- Re: FLUXLIST: test x Roger Stevens
- Re: FLUXLIST: test x Sol Nte
- Re: FLUXLIST: test x Heiko Recktenwald
- Re: FLUXLIST: test x St.Auby Tamas
- Re: FLUXLIST: test x Losonczi J�lia
- Re: FLUXLIST: test x Sol Nte
- Re: FLUXLIST: test x John M. Bennett
- Re: FLUXLIST: test x Deborah
- Re: FLUXLIST: test x Carol Starr
- FLUXLIST: FFFO testresponse alan bowman
- Re: FLUXLIST: test x Eryk Salvaggio
- Re: FLUXLIST: test x Heiko Recktenwald
- Re: FLUXLIST: test x meryl
- Re: FLUXLIST: test x narvis & ...pez
- Re: FLUXLIST: test x Roger Stevens
- Re: FLUXLIST: test x Roger Stevens
- Re: FLUXLIST: test x { brad brace }
- Re: FLUXLIST: test x Alex Cook

