C'est la vie
I meant to say, Selavy, as he was in touch with his feminine
side...
As Rrose Selavy
See my rather blurry scan of my little known assemblage/collage,
"Marcel Rrose, After Stella Ray"
http://www.artden.freeserve.co.uk/izone/fluxuseyezone.html
But, I'm not allowed to talk
and i finally saw 'high fidelity'
c :)
carol starr
taos, new mexico, usa
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Tue, 23 May 2000, Patricia wrote:
(I finally saw The Fight Club : )
PK
In a message dated 05/23/2000 9:12:48 AM Eastern Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I meant to say, Selavy, as he was in touch with his feminine
side...
would that be on the left or right side?
As far as I can tell, it was the full frontal side, all dressed up,
with plenty of places to go.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In a message dated 05/23/2000 9:12:48 AM Eastern Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I meant to say, Selavy, as he was in touch with his feminine
side...
would
Patricia I AGREE WITH YOU. My family, friends who do not
understand art think I can't make money on my art because
I don't know how to do that or I'm not good enough. In one way that is
true- mentally, plilosophically, intuitively, I CANNOT make what the
public seems to want. There is a very
Terrence writes;
ok ok i am playing devils advocate (and being a bit playful) but really one must go on
you have to look at the circumstances of the time. He was way ahead of his time but so
were others. People still paint and many more paint and don't know a thing of the 1913
armory show. I
I see (?) hear you, Terrence and certainly agree with your last line. My comment
about the
Armory Show is ingrained - it sticks with me as a highlight of the art history
education
part of my life. When I saw a wall of works from the exhibit at the Norton Simon
Museum in
Pasadena, it hit me
Terrence writes;
Art is commercial the moment you seek to engage it as "culture". ie in the culture
industry. Duchamp was revoultutionalry thinker for the arts but not necessrily a
revolutionary professional artist. He canged the art making oeuvre but for other
artists with their
Terrence writes
Postitution is an honest exchange at a fair market value or as supply and demand
and it never seeks to qualify for grants to support it.
I abohore patriarchy as an infantile wish. I see Duchamp as a creator of ideas
that some pick up on. It's not a rule, like a lesson from daddy
At 12:03 pm -0700 20/5/00, Patricia wrote:
Yep, he played chess and he
played chess because he had achieved his freedom - he only made, as far as
I know
30-40 works in 50 or so years - he made art to make art, for himself - he was
focused and free and I think it admirable. Of course, he had
Terrence J Kosick wrote:
Terrence writes
Postitution is an honest exchange at a fair market value or as supply and demand
and it never seeks to qualify for grants to support it.
Really? What about the pimp? : )
I abohore patriarchy as an infantile wish. I see Duchamp as a creator of
Terrence writes;
I don't agree with this. Duchamp, in a purely objective practical way, was a
sort of a clever aragont lazy artist and he was not a professional painter. He
was more of a dabbler and and a chess player and mostly unemployed. He talked
more than he produced art. I don't feel
At 09:42 am + 19/5/00, Terrence J Kosick wrote:
Terrence writes;
I don't agree with this. Duchamp, in a purely objective practical way, was a
sort of a clever aragont lazy artist and he was not a professional painter. He
was more of a dabbler and and a chess player and mostly unemployed. He
"the creative act.
"let us consider two important factors, the two poles of the creation of
art: the artist on the one hand, and on the other the spectator who later
becomes the posterity.
"to all appearances, the artists acts like a mediumnistic being who, from
the labyrinth beyond time ans
14 matches
Mail list logo
