On 05/04/2013, at 7:19 AM, Kirk Fraser overcomer@gmail.com wrote:
The main source of invention is not math wins as described on
http://www.vpri.org/html/work/ifnct.htm since the world would be speaking
math if it were really the source of inspiring more inventions that improve
the
Okay, SICP, EOPL and TAPL I've worked out (own/am working through
slowly). But ItoA? Google wasn't exactly helpful here.
On 4 April 2013 22:22, Gath-Gealaich gath.na.geala...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Apr 4, 2013 at 11:01 PM, Kirk Fraser overcomer@gmail.com
wrote:
Fortran was displaced in
On 2013-04-05 11:40AM, Piers Cawley wrote:
Okay, SICP, EOPL and TAPL I've worked out (own/am working through
slowly). But ItoA? Google wasn't exactly helpful here.
Probably _Introduction to Algorithms_ by Cormen, Leiserson, Rivest, and
Stein.
--Josh
Hi,
I don't think this acronym is in wide use, but probably Introduction To
Algorithms by Cormen was meant.
Cheers,
Jarosław Rzeszótko
2013/4/5 Piers Cawley pdcaw...@bofh.org.uk
Okay, SICP, EOPL and TAPL I've worked out (own/am working through
slowly). But ItoA? Google wasn't exactly
Actually that's your reasoning. Years ago when I was in college, educators
wrote that innovation for innovation's sake is worth nothing. Truly
worthwhile inventions judging by percent of Nobel Prize awards are by Jews,
hence in Hebrew. But until the world converts to their superior culture,
The fact that we're not communicating very effectively disproves your point. ;-)
Julian
On 06/04/2013, at 12:42 AM, Kirk Fraser overcomer@gmail.com wrote:
Actually that's your reasoning. Years ago when I was in college, educators
wrote that innovation for innovation's sake is worth
Apology accepted. ;-)
Julian
On 06/04/2013, at 12:42 AM, Kirk Fraser overcomer@gmail.com wrote:
Actually that's your reasoning. Years ago when I was in college, educators
wrote that innovation for innovation's sake is worth nothing. Truly
worthwhile inventions judging by percent of
Okay, at this point, I have to recommend the sequence mentioned in the
subject. Here:
http://lesswrong.com/lw/od/37_ways_that_words_can_be_wrong/
Simply put, a human mind have a certain structure, most of which is
universally shared among functioning members of a human society (like
the
On Fri, Apr 05, 2013 at 06:42:53AM -0700, Kirk Fraser wrote:
[…] Truly worthwhile inventions judging by percent of Nobel Prize
awards are by Jews, hence in Hebrew. […]
Are your saying that most Nobel prize winning Jews were using Hebrew
to think the thoughts that lead them to the Nobel prize?
I was pointing out that innovation for its own sake is worthless then was
agreeing with the view that not all the world's inventions come from people
who think in English yet pointing out communicating in English is best for
world wide distribution. I don't really know how many Jews who won Nobel
On Fri, Apr 5, 2013 at 7:59 PM, Kirk Fraser overcomer@gmail.com wrote:
I was pointing out that innovation for its own sake is worthless then was
agreeing with the view that not all the world's inventions come from people
who think in English yet pointing out communicating in English is
Gath,
So what language do you normally think in? You have stated you don't live
in America. Obviously you haven't listened to Rush Limbaugh long enough to
know what liberal is. Why comment on things you know so little about?
Tune in to Rush via iheart radio and listen for about 6 weeks and
Loup,
Thanks for the link. Those 37 ways might help build a truth maintenance
system.
On Fri, Apr 5, 2013 at 9:06 AM, Loup Vaillant-David
l...@loup-vaillant.frwrote:
Okay, at this point, I have to recommend the sequence mentioned in the
subject. Here:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 04/05/2013 04:19 PM, Kirk Fraser wrote:
snippage
Tune in to Rush via iheart radio and listen for about 6 weeks and you'll have
more clarity on what liberal actually
means in America.
Heh. This statement far more offensive than all of the
I am now convinced we are on some sort of mailing list version of candid
camera. Or maybe these messages are the product of some strange markovian
email generator programmed to create dissonance by combining fringe comp
sci theories with offensive social commentary normally reserved for talk
Ya think!? Did I really just waste five minutes...?
Let us all go home and try to regain some clarity. Interesting points all
but are we done?
Alan M.
On Apr 5, 2013, at 1:35 PM, shaun gilchrist shaunxc...@gmail.com wrote:
I am now convinced we are on some sort of mailing list version of
Charlie Derr wrote:
Nevertheless I'm finding some of this conversation truly fascinating (though
I'm having a little trouble figuring out
what is truth and what isn't).
I'm just waiting for Kirk to mention Atlantis or the Rosicrucians. It
feels like it could be any moment...
17 matches
Mail list logo
