Re: Long licence

2003-02-21 Thread Jeremias Maerki
I know. Everyone here at Apache feels the same but AFAIK this is not possible. In today's world lawyers still seem to be more important than software developers. :-) It would be so cool, if IDEs would have the ability to hide a licence at the beginning of a file. Anyway, I can't give you a

Problem with fop

2003-02-21 Thread Isabel Fuentes
Dear sir/madam of xml.apache.org, I'm writing to you in order to know if you could help me with the following problem: I'm working with fop-0,20.1 version to create a pdf document using xml and xslt, but when I install the application into a computer with Windows XP, the following message

Re: Problem with fop

2003-02-21 Thread Jochen . Maes
hi Isabelle, I'm not from Apache but i work on XP with FOP. Are you running Xp Home or XP Pro Are you running the process as a normal user, or as a superuser (i think the XP word is computer administrator)? i had the problem when i used the application as a normal user, but as computer

Re: Problem with fop

2003-02-21 Thread Jeremias Maerki
I'm working with FOP on Windows XP and have absolutely no problems. I suggest you contact your Domain administrator to sort out security restrictions on your machine. This problem, anyway, has nothing to do with FOP directly. By the way, you should consider upgrading your FOP version. (not that

Re: Problem with fop

2003-02-21 Thread Isabel Fuentes
Hi, I'm running the process as administrator, the XP Pro. What version FOP are you running? I`ve upgrading the FOP version to fop-20.3, the following message error appears: [ERROR] 'master-reference' for 'fo:page-sequence' matches no 'simple-page-master' or 'page-sequence-master' . I've changed

Re: Problem with fop

2003-02-21 Thread Jeremias Maerki
0.20.3 is still a pretty old version. Download 0.20.4 or 0.20.5rc2. And please read the release notes under http://xml.apache.org/fop/relnotes.html. On 21.02.2003 11:52:17 Isabel Fuentes wrote: Hi, I'm running the process as administrator, the XP Pro. What version FOP are you running? I`ve

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 17277] New: - Multiple fo:page-sequence generates blank page between

2003-02-21 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17277. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 17277] - Multiple fo:page-sequence generates blank page between

2003-02-21 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17277. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

Re: Licence issues in hyphenation patterns

2003-02-21 Thread Dirk-Willem van Gulik
On Fri, 21 Feb 2003, J.Pietschmann wrote: I am donating the hyphenation file to the ASF, and although it would be nice to keep the copyright, I think that would hamper future enhancements, or not? As long as you don't choose to revoke the license for all future and past versions (rather

Re: Long licence

2003-02-21 Thread Dirk-Willem van Gulik
On Fri, 21 Feb 2003, Jeremias Maerki wrote: software developers. :-) It would be so cool, if IDEs would have the ability to hide a licence at the beginning of a file. I;ve seen some clever pragma's/markers which let emacs do this. DW

RE: Long licence

2003-02-21 Thread Arved Sandstrom
Dirk, you may have seen my post on members, about this. The whole length of license issue. I find it odd that it's OK to suggest tools (IDEs/editors, etc) to hide a license. When the argument presented to the board was presumably that the long license is legally required. I'd like to find out

Re: Problem with fop

2003-02-21 Thread Isabel Fuentes
Hi, I've download fop-0.20.5rc2. and I've read the release notes but I've a problem again. If I execute fop.bat from command line it works fine, however if I do it from Internet Explorer 6 SP 1 I get the following error message: Error creating process Denied Access - Original Message -

Re: Long licence

2003-02-21 Thread Jeremias Maerki
Arved, I don't see what's bad about it. The licence stays in every file as necessary, the IDE should just as a service to the developer hide the licence because it's not relevant to normal development tasks. On 21.02.2003 14:01:34 Arved Sandstrom wrote: I find it odd that it's OK to suggest

Re: Problem with fop

2003-02-21 Thread Jochen . Maes
what do you mean with doing it from the internet explorer? You mean from a servlet? or after browsing your local drives in internet explorer? Jochen Maes ICT Development KBC Securities (kbcsecurities.com) Havenlaan 12 Avenue du Port SIF 8683 B-1080 Brussels Belgium

Re: Problem with fop

2003-02-21 Thread Jeremias Maerki
Oh, there's some interesting bit of information: How exactly do you call fop.bat from Internet Explorer? Strikes me as an odd thing to do? What are you trying to accomplish? Or are you using a servlet and Acrobat Reader has a problem starting up inside Internet Explorer? On 21.02.2003 14:16:11

Re: Problem with fop

2003-02-21 Thread Jochen . Maes
sorry didn't see this one before.. I run fop-20.3 without any problem... greetings... Jochen Maes ICT Development KBC Securities (kbcsecurities.com) Havenlaan 12 Avenue du Port SIF 8683 B-1080 Brussels Belgium Tel: +32 2 429 96 81

Re: Problem with fop

2003-02-21 Thread Isabel Fuentes
I've a web application developed in ASP, XML and XSL thecnology and I execute fop.bat from ASP file. - Original Message - From: Jeremias Maerki [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, February 21, 2003 2:21 PM Subject: Re: Problem with fop Oh, there's some interesting

Re: Problem with fop

2003-02-21 Thread Jochen . Maes
Ok Isabelle, There is a property in the IIS5.0 manager that lets you geve access to certain actions (run scripts execute all etc). Make sure this is set to run all... Furthermore, i would strongly recommend using a servlet. It isn't difficult to set up (nice examples) and it will make your life

RE: Long licence

2003-02-21 Thread Arved Sandstrom
Jeremias, a deliberate decision was taken to frown on condensed licenses or references. That tell me that there is a legal requirement for the license to be in your face. So to speak. In any case, the board was presented (I assume) with a legal opinion to that effect. Which, although IANAL, I

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 3898] - fo:page-number-citation fails if id is in block with break-before=page

2003-02-21 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3898. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

RE: Long licence

2003-02-21 Thread Dirk-Willem van Gulik
On Fri, 21 Feb 2003, Arved Sandstrom wrote: I'd like to find out what lawyer thought a long license is needed with every file. Because I question that finding. Question the board@ (again) for a black/white answer - or work with licensing@ for a more interactive reply. But Bear in mind that

Re: Licence issues in hyphenation patterns

2003-02-21 Thread J.Pietschmann
Jeremias Maerki wrote: The important part for us is that the LPPL is not viral, with the exception of the filename prohibition. In particular it allows distributing derived work (read: binary FOP distributions) without the code. Yes, but see point 4, for example. That will be difficult for the

XMLReader...

2003-02-21 Thread Swapan Golla
I am trying to convert an svg document into pdf using fo:external-graphic. It doesn't seem to work properly on weblogic server. It gives the following error: [ERROR] Could not load external SVG: SAX2 driver class weblogic.xml.jaxp.RegistryXMLReader loaded but cannot be instantiated (no empty

Re: Licence issues in hyphenation patterns

2003-02-21 Thread Peter B. West
Jeremias Maerki wrote: On 20.02.2003 23:58:48 J.Pietschmann wrote: BTW we should track down and delete all binary distribution containing the compiled hyph file from the three GPL sources. The source distributions are not an immediate risk and can be kept. Who has access to the distro