cvs commit: xml-fop/src/java/org/apache/fop/viewer PreviewDialog.java

2003-08-29 Thread gmazza
gmazza 2003/08/28 16:43:50 Modified:src/java/org/apache/fop/render/awt AWTRenderer.java src/java/org/apache/fop/viewer PreviewDialog.java Log: (Very) initial steps in activating AWTRenderer PreviewDialog in 1.0 (creating outer page). Revision ChangesPath

Re: StaticContentLayoutManager

2003-08-29 Thread Chris Bowditch
From: Victor Mote [EMAIL PROTECTED] FOP Developers: I just committed a change (for the FO isolation work) that may have broken my general rule of not changing the substance of what is going on in the code. The fo/pagination/StaticContent stored a reference to a StaticContentLayoutManager and

block-container issues/compliance page

2003-08-29 Thread Chris Bowditch
FOP Devs, there have been a couple of questions on use of block-containers and absolute positioning this week. I couldnt see anything obvious on the website, but I may have missed it. In either case I thought it would be useful to add a few words about block-container to the compliance page. I

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 22811] - [PATCH] block-container notes on compliance page

2003-08-29 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22811. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

RE: StaticContentLayoutManager

2003-08-29 Thread Victor Mote
Chris Bowditch wrote: just a thought on this. The previous behaviour of the StaticContent LM that you describe above is like a singleton. Isnt the reason StaticContent LM is behaving like a singleton, because static content should only be laid out one time? It may not change behaviour if

RE: StaticContentLayoutManager

2003-08-29 Thread Joerg Pietschmann
Well, the actual layout for static content can obviously differ from page to page because of markers and page numbers. However, constructing a LM is expensive, and in the original code I wrote a new LM would have been created for each page if the FO didn't keep it, which would have cause unwanted

RE: StaticContentLayoutManager

2003-08-29 Thread Victor Mote
Joerg Pietschmann wrote: Well, the actual layout for static content can obviously differ from page to page because of markers and page numbers. However, constructing a LM is expensive, and in the original code I wrote a new LM would have been created for each page if the FO didn't keep it,

cvs commit: xml-fop/src/java/org/apache/fop/layoutmgr PageLayoutManager.java

2003-08-29 Thread vmote
vmote 2003/08/29 13:02:11 Modified:src/java/org/apache/fop/layoutmgr PageLayoutManager.java Log: store a collection of StaticContentLayoutManager objects, keyed by flow-name, to be used instead of creating new ones each time one is needed Revision ChangesPath 1.18

RE: StaticContentLayoutManager

2003-08-29 Thread Victor Mote
Victor Mote wrote: OK, that is good information. Essentially, I have caused that unwanted overhead. So probably what I should do is store the StaticContentLM reference in the related RegionLM. I'll work on that. Regions don't have LMs, so I created a HashMap of the StaticContentLMs in the