Peter B. West wrote:
In the medium term, I think some sort of protocol for provides/requires
and versioning will have to be established for matching jars. It has
always galled me that everyone bundles everything to ensure that a
particular application runs.
Short: use Maven.
What does
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25467.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25474.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25480.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25480.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25480.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25480.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
I don't think so, as potential fop-dev have to learn about other things,
too, especially CVS and how to build patches. I think that's a lot more
complicated than having to install Ant.
fop-devs can be expected to know about Ant because almost every Open
Source project written in Java I've
Hi,
Inspired by the recent talk about optimizations, I have tried to look
for low hanging fruits that can speed up FOP, and as I expected I did
not find any silver bullets.
On the other hand a series of smaller adjustments to the property
handling has improved the total processing time about
Jeremias,
On Dec 12, 2003, at 7:13 AM, Jeremias Maerki wrote:
I don't think so, as potential fop-dev have to learn about other
things,
too, especially CVS and how to build patches. I think that's a lot more
complicated than having to install Ant.
fop-devs can be expected to know about Ant
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25480.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25480.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25480.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25480.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25480.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25480.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
gmazza 2003/12/12 14:37:39
Modified:src/java/org/apache/fop/pdf PDFResources.java
src/java/org/apache/fop/render PrintRenderer.java
src/java/org/apache/fop/render/mif MIFHandler.java
src/java/org/apache/fop/render/pdf PDFRenderer.java
Thanks, Finn and John Austin, for your efforts here.
Victor, not to rush you, but how agreeable are you in
general on switching to integer enumerations for FOP
properties? (Given Alt-Design, Peter obviously
approves.) I checked Alt-Design's PropNames.java[1]
and liked what I saw. It doesn't
Glen Mazza wrote:
Victor, not to rush you, but how agreeable are you in
general on switching to integer enumerations for FOP
properties? (Given Alt-Design, Peter obviously
approves.) I checked Alt-Design's PropNames.java[1]
and liked what I saw. It doesn't necessarily have to
be that particular
Finn Bock wrote:
Hi,
Inspired by the recent talk about optimizations, I have tried to look
for low hanging fruits that can speed up FOP, and as I expected I did
not find any silver bullets.
On the other hand a series of smaller adjustments to the property
handling has improved the total
Glen Mazza wrote:
Thanks, Finn and John Austin, for your efforts here.
Victor, not to rush you, but how agreeable are you in
general on switching to integer enumerations for FOP
properties? (Given Alt-Design, Peter obviously
approves.) I checked Alt-Design's PropNames.java[1]
and liked what I
J.Pietschmann wrote:
Glen Mazza wrote:
Victor, not to rush you, but how agreeable are you in
general on switching to integer enumerations for FOP
properties? (Given Alt-Design, Peter obviously
approves.) I checked Alt-Design's PropNames.java[1]
and liked what I saw. It doesn't necessarily have
22 matches
Mail list logo
