DO NOT REPLY [Bug 28705] - PDF Text search doesnt work for embedded fonts.

2004-09-23 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28705. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 5335] - Text with embedded CID fonts not retrievable from pdf

2004-09-23 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=5335. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 29608] - FOP out of memory exception

2004-09-23 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29608. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

Re: cvs commit: xml-fop/src/java/org/apache/fop/fo/pagination Root.java

2004-09-23 Thread Glen Mazza
I guess I'm the guilty one here--but I have the tabbing option shut off in JEdit, I'll be more careful (and test at home what is happening.) Sorry/Thanks, Glen --- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: jeremias2004/09/23 03:04:36 Modified:src/java/org/apache/fop/area StorePagesModel.java

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 5335] - Text with embedded CID fonts not retrievable from pdf

2004-09-23 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=5335. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 14356] - *NOT* embedding TrueTypeFont in PDF causes AcrobatReader displaying only dots

2004-09-23 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14356. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

[From fop-user] RE: problem in rendering PS image

2004-09-23 Thread Victor Mote
[Thread moved from fop-user] Jeremias Maerki wrote: Note: Support for EPS graphics in PDF has been deprecated with the latest specs. When I saw this comment, I went looking for this in the PDF Reference, Third Edition (for PDF 1.4) and Fourth Edition (for PDF 1.5), and couldn't find it.

Re: [From fop-user] RE: problem in rendering PS image

2004-09-23 Thread Jeremias Maerki
On 23.09.2004 16:38:51 Victor Mote wrote: [Thread moved from fop-user] Jeremias Maerki wrote: Note: Support for EPS graphics in PDF has been deprecated with the latest specs. When I saw this comment, I went looking for this in the PDF Reference, Third Edition (for PDF 1.4) and

RE: [From fop-user] RE: problem in rendering PS image

2004-09-23 Thread Victor Mote
Jeremias Maerki wrote: PDF Reference Fourth Edition Version 1.5: Chapter 4.7.1, page 296: Note: Since PDF 1.4 encompasses all of the Adobe imaging model features of the PostScript language, there is no longer any reason to use PostScript XObjects. This feature is likely to be removed

Re: [From fop-user] RE: problem in rendering PS image

2004-09-23 Thread Jeremias Maerki
Yes, I mean java.awt.Graphics2D because if you have that you can generate PDF (using the PDF transcoder) and SVG (using Batik's SVGGraphics2D) from it already and you can even use it with the AWT renderer (which I prefer to call Java2D renderer). Obviously, this is not important for PS output

Re: [From fop-user] RE: problem in rendering PS image

2004-09-23 Thread Clay Leeds
On Sep 23, 2004, at 11:07 AM, Jeremias Maerki wrote: Well, you've just loaded me with another exciting thing to watch. I've already got too many of them. Damn. Can we vote on making a day last 26h instead of 24? +1! Ride 'em cowboy! This *is* exciting! I haven't had this much fun watching the

Re: [From fop-user] RE: problem in rendering PS image

2004-09-23 Thread Jeremias Maerki
On 23.09.2004 20:18:33 Clay Leeds wrote: On Sep 23, 2004, at 11:07 AM, Jeremias Maerki wrote: Well, you've just loaded me with another exciting thing to watch. I've already got too many of them. Damn. Can we vote on making a day last 26h instead of 24? +1! Ride 'em cowboy! This *is*

Loading of extension element mappings.

2004-09-23 Thread Finn Bock
Hi Team, I think the API for adding additional element mappings to the FOUserAgent is bound to cause problems when fop is deployed in a multi classloader environment. Using tomcat as an example, an extension mapping deployed in a webapp can not be found if a well meaning administrator has

Re: Loading of extension element mappings.

2004-09-23 Thread Jeremias Maerki
On 23.09.2004 23:34:20 Finn Bock wrote: I think the API for adding additional element mappings to the FOUserAgent is bound to cause problems when fop is deployed in a multi classloader environment. Using tomcat as an example, an extension mapping deployed in a webapp can not be found if

Re: Loading of extension element mappings.

2004-09-23 Thread Glen Mazza
--- Jeremias Maerki [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: So I propose to change the API signature from FOUserAgent.addElementMapping(String) to FOUserAgent.addElementMapping(ElementMapping) Keep both, please. Unless there is a legitimate reason, I would strongly prefer choosing one or

RE: XML Graphics: board concerns

2004-09-23 Thread Keiron Liddle
Hi, Thanks for the support. I will go ahead and do whatever I can to help out with this and be part of the XML graphics PMC. I have read all the emails about this concept and think that it is a good idea and should help things develop in useful directions. Regards, Keiron Liddle -Original

Re: XML Graphics: board concerns

2004-09-23 Thread Glen Mazza
Jeremias Maerki wrote: Batik and FOP devs, things have been quiet but I finally know the reason. The board hasn't approved the creation of the XML Graphics project due to the following concern: They didn't recognize any names on the PMC list. Jeremias, this is just not plausible.

Remove image.JimiImage from HEAD?

2004-09-23 Thread Glen Mazza
(resending...having email problems) Team (probably Jeremias), According to [1] JIMI is for pre-Java2 JDK's (1.1 series). JAI is for 1.3 or later JDK's [2], which is FOP 1.0's area of concern. If so, does this mean we can get rid of image.JimiImage in HEAD, FOP 1.0 presumably not designed to

Re: XML Graphics: board concerns

2004-09-23 Thread Clay Leeds
On Sep 23, 2004, at 5:54 PM, Glen Mazza wrote: Jeremias Maerki wrote: Batik and FOP devs, things have been quiet but I finally know the reason. The board hasn't approved the creation of the XML Graphics project due to the following concern: They didn't recognize any names on the PMC list.

remove Area.Title?

2004-09-23 Thread Glen Mazza
Team, Anyone know of a reason to keep Area.Title subclassed [1] from LineArea? The subclass is empty and has been since its inception three years ago, and the definition of the fo:title element [2] doesn't appear to indicate anything special that would call for its subclassing from LineArea.