On Thu, 20 Nov 2003, John Austin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
So far I have been playing around like the Neanderthal*
that I am. I use Sun Java 1.4.x with xterm, vi, emacs and
occasionally Jedit when I feel modern urges.
[snip]
* Is that term Politically Correct ? Would it be offensive to
On Sat, 16 Aug 2003, Jeremias Maerki [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
I'll see what I can do about the nightly build, though.
http://gump.covalent.net/jars/latest/jakarta-commons-sandbox/
not exactly a nightly build, but the jar that has been created by
Gump's last run.
If you can put together a
On Fri, 11 Jul 2003, M. Sean Gilligan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The advantages to shipping with Ant are that it would become more of
a standard and get more exposure and usage.
Sure. In the early days Ant used to absorb tasks from each and every
problem domain to get more exposure itself. I
On Sat, 12 Jul 2003, Glen Mazza [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Perfectly understandable, as you would not want poorly maintained
optional tasks ending up degrading Ant's reputation as a build tool.
It's not only a question of reputation.
One of Ant's biggest burdens is backwards compatibility, and
On Thu, 10 Jul 2003, M. Sean Gilligan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Putting the Fop task directly in Ant would be great. I would really
like to see that happen. I suppose we could get it in Ant 1.6 if we
submit it soon. Does anyone know what the criteria is for inclusion
as a Core or Optional
One little thing I forgot to mention.
On Fri, 14 Dec 2001, Sam Ruby [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[about FOP's xslt task]
Finally, there is a depends attribute which can declare other files
which are referenced for the uptodate check. This can be done with
the uptodate task. This is the only
On 14 Dec 2001, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
now uses built in ant manifest task (under jar)
Thanks.
I've added a testcase for Ant so that Ant's builds will continue to
fail until we fix the problem, and you won't be bothered by GUMP mails
any longer.
To get the hostname, at least for Windows
On Fri, 14 Dec 2001, Keiron Liddle [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thanks, I have updated the build file to use the manifest under jar,
works fine.
Great!
Looking at the hostname I think that it is better left out, it may
cause computers to attempt to connect to the internet when resolving
the
On Fri, 14 Dec 2001, Sam Ruby [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Stefan Bodewig wrote:
I guess my response to your commit message hasn't made it to
fop-dev yet.
I've manually approved two more messages.
Thanks, shouldn't be necessary any longer, I've subscribed to fop-dev
shortly after sending my
I think I know what's going on, but I don't have all pieces together
to test it (yet) - does it work if you move the taskdef for FOP's
manifest task out of the target and make it a sibling of target?
Stefan
-
To unsubscribe,
On Thu, 13 Dec 2001, Sam Ruby [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Did something change in Ant yesterday which made the properties file
take precidence over taskdefs?
No, at least not yesterday. What has changed yesterday is that we've
added a new task named manifest, so there simply hasn't been any
A quick fix, change the package target to
target name=package depends=compile,hyphenation
echo message=Creating the jar file ${build.dir}/${name}.jar/
jar jarfile=${build.dir}/${name}.jar
basedir=${build.dest}
includes=org/**,conf/**,hyph/**
manifest
I'm currently not subscribed to fop-dev and responding to a post I've
picked up from the archives, sorry, please keep ant-dev in the CC.
Keiron Liddle [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
We can update the FOP build to use the core ant manifest task and a
new ant. This is no real problem.
I don't see
On Fri, 10 Aug 2001, Alex McLintock [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
There is no forum for Jakarta discussion. There is no mailing list
for discussing all the sub projects as a whole.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Stefan
-
To unsubscribe,
On Mon, 30 Jul 2001, Keiron Liddle [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've tried to work out what the problem with this is without
success. The information suggests there is no xalan1 and that
xalan2 is present (at least for the first bit).
I think it is that JAXP 1.1 is present (and thus the TraX
On Thu, 19 Jul 2001, David Ryan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
font metrics-file=gara.xml kerning=yes embed-file=gara.ttf
font-triplet name=gara style=normal weight=normal
/font
Can you see anything wrong with this?
You don't close the font-triplet element. Make that
font-triplet
Karen Lease [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I see there are several of these. I guess they are coming from the
automatic nightly build.
Yes, I think so (not sure whether Sam is reading this list and as I'm
at least a little familiar with Gump, I thought I should jump in).
This message comes from a
17 matches
Mail list logo
