Fopdevs,
It might make life a little easier if library jars retained common names
as we upgraded; ant.jar, for instance. We have a many version-numbered
jars in lib, the most particular of which is
commons-io-dev-20030703.jar. As we are all getting our libraries
updated through CVS anyway,
As we are all getting
our libraries
updated through CVS anyway, would it not be better
to name them
consistently, and include a text file detailing the
current versions?
Peter
--
I don't think so--it is helpful to immediately see the
version of the libraries when viewing the files.
On 7/11/2003 6:49 AM, Glen Mazza wrote:
I don't think so--it is helpful to immediately see the
version of the libraries when viewing the files. I
suspect that text file you're mentioning will out fall
out of date--and users may be unaware of it.
I should preface this with: I've used CVS to submit
