RE: [PATCH] changes to bugs.xml doc

2002-11-20 Thread Victor Mote
Keiron Liddle wrote: > I'm not really sure what is the source of the problem. > A few of the patches had hunks failing and some worked with fuzz > offsets. One error meesage I got was that it couldn't find the ">" > character on line 9, so I went to line 9 and found the ">" character, of > course

RE: [PATCH] changes to bugs.xml doc

2002-11-19 Thread Keiron Liddle
On Tue, 2002-11-19 at 18:59, Victor Mote wrote: > Keiron Liddle wrote: > > > Still having some trouble with diffs, it might be something to do with > > downloading via IE. > > Thanks for pointing this out -- I didn't realize there was a problem. I do > use IE to upload the attachments through Bug

RE: [PATCH] changes to bugs.xml doc

2002-11-19 Thread Victor Mote
Keiron Liddle wrote: > Still having some trouble with diffs, it might be something to do with > downloading via IE. Thanks for pointing this out -- I didn't realize there was a problem. I do use IE to upload the attachments through Bugzilla. Do you think that is the source of the problem? Also, s

Re: [PATCH] changes to bugs.xml doc

2002-11-19 Thread Keiron Liddle
On Mon, 2002-11-18 at 19:47, Victor Mote wrote: > I did not realize until I looked right now that I failed to use the -u > option on my diff. Sorry about that. > > Yes, we should change all of the declarations to be consistent. I'll go > ahead & do that en masse instead of piecemeal. Thanks, all