Victor Mote wrote:
Simon Pepping wrote:
I sympathize with this goal as well. I realize that that is
not quite in line with my reaction to Glen's recent patch. I
agree with Chris and Glen that it is not currently a key goal
for FOP. And since we do not have a strong proponent and
architect of
Arnd Beißner wrote:
Peter B. West [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 19.05.2004 00:12:41:
I think you are talking about different modularisation
contexts here.
You might want to clarify this part of the discussion with Victor.
I really thought it was about the pluggable layout that
Victor
Chris Bowditch wrote:
I dont recall modularizarion being opposed. It was more a
case of Joerg saying
it would be a challenge and no one else stepping up to
support your proposals.
When I left the project, there were 5 active developers, 1 for, 2 against, 2
neutral or silent. Joerg and I
Victor Mote wrote:
Dear FOP Developers:
Hi Victor - welcome back. I was saddened by your decision to leave FOP.
After considering a return to FOP development, and briefly discussing the
pros and cons with those whom I consider to be the FOP development leaders,
I have decided to partially fork FOP
Peter B. West [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 18.05.2004 05:59:20:
project. The situation with FOray is more complicated. I don't know
whether it is Victor's intention to fork from HEAD and continue the
development along the lines he has previously discussed, or to attempt
to integrate HEAD
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Some elaborations on this from my side. Please feel free to ignore it
entirely.
Thanks for speaking up. Just because you are not a committer, doesnt mean your
opinion doesnt matter. This is open source way. The project is owned by everyone.
snip/
5. Time goes on, A' and
Chris Bowditch [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 18.05.2004 12:03:33:
This is very true, I also have the same concerns, which is why I have
set out
some simple objectives that must be met before the redesign is ready for
an
initial release. See here:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Chris Bowditch [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 18.05.2004 12:03:33:
This is very true, I also have the same concerns, which is why I have
set out
some simple objectives that must be met before the redesign is ready for
an initial release. See here:
Chris Bowditch [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on: 18.05.2004 14:31:39:
What I forgot to say is that I think we should do an initial release of
FOP
after doing just High priority TODO items.
Ok, that changes things, of course.
Yes, ugly output can be caused without border collapse, but yet
On Tue, May 18, 2004 at 09:16:23AM +0100, Chris Bowditch wrote:
Victor Mote wrote:
Dear FOP Developers:
Hi Victor - welcome back. I was saddened by your decision to leave FOP.
After considering a return to FOP development, and briefly discussing the
pros and cons with those whom I
Simon Pepping wrote:
2. modularize FOP's design
I do understand why you have decided to start FOray. Although
modularisation is a nice feature, I dont see it as a key
goal for FOP.
FOP's primary objective is to achieve a working layout. The main
things needed to achieve this are
Victor Mote [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 18.05.2004 22:12:45:
The real question on modularity was never whether it should be a
priority,
but whether it hurt the project. On open-source projects, priorities are
really set by each individual. You fix the thing that hurts the most at
the
moment,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In my formatter, I have implemented modularized layout. From the start, I
was sceptical, and I was indeed tempted several times to throw the concept
out of the window because it got in the way, but in the end it was always
possible to maintain the separation of concerns
N.B. CC'd to [EMAIL PROTECTED] follow-up to fop-dev
Victor Mote wrote:
Dear FOP Developers:
After considering a return to FOP development, and briefly discussing the
pros and cons with those whom I consider to be the FOP development leaders,
I have decided to partially fork FOP into a sourceforge
Peter B. West wrote:
Such a move would, obviously, have little or no impact on the
main project. The situation with FOray is more complicated.
I don't know whether it is Victor's intention to fork from
HEAD and continue the development along the lines he has
previously discussed, or to
15 matches
Mail list logo
