Glen Mazza wrote:
They're coming very close (I suspect in a few weeks at
the latest) to having a Last Call version--would it
be acceptable for you at that stage? I don't mind
waiting a little longer.
Second edition of working Draft was released today :-)
snip/
Chris
face color=red/ ;-)
--- Chris Bowditch [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Glen Mazza wrote:
They're coming very close (I suspect in a few
weeks at
the latest) to having a Last Call version--would
it
be acceptable for you at that stage? I don't mind
waiting a little longer.
Second edition
-Original Message-
From: Glen Mazza [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--- Andreas L. Delmelle [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Hi Glen,
the XSL 1.1 WD, but since that's all it is ATM, a
'Working Draft', changing
their namespace might be a bit premature (?[*]),
They're coming very close (I
-Original Message-
From: Glen Mazza [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi Glen,
Very much in favor of changing the extension elements' names to conform with
the XSL 1.1 WD, but since that's all it is ATM, a 'Working Draft', changing
their namespace might be a bit premature (?[*]), unless we
--- Andreas L. Delmelle [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
the XSL 1.1 WD, but since that's all it is ATM, a
'Working Draft', changing
their namespace might be a bit premature (?[*]),
They're coming very close (I suspect in a few weeks at
the latest) to having a Last Call version--would it
be
