Re: Ensuring integrity & searchability of ML archives (was Re: [REQUEST] XML Graphics setup) (Modified by Clay Leeds)

2004-11-02 Thread Clay Leeds
On Nov 1, 2004, at 1:11 PM, Berin Lautenbach wrote: Clay Leeds wrote: When the Apache Forrest project changed to a new domain, they also changed from [EMAIL PROTECTED] to [EMAIL PROTECTED] & [EMAIL PROTECTED] Unfortunately, with this change comes (IMHO) a significant problem for browsers of t

Re: Ensuring integrity & searchability of ML archives (was Re: [REQUEST] XML Graphics setup) (Modified by Clay Leeds)

2004-11-02 Thread Berin Lautenbach
Clay Leeds wrote: When the Apache Forrest project changed to a new domain, they also changed from [EMAIL PROTECTED] to [EMAIL PROTECTED] & [EMAIL PROTECTED] Unfortunately, with this change comes (IMHO) a significant problem for browsers of the archives: forrest-dev@ mail is a completely separate

Re: [REQUEST] XML Graphics setup

2004-11-01 Thread Glen Mazza
BTW, we do not necessarily need to change the email addresses for the FOP and Batik mailing lists. It would nice anyway to keep the archives as one, instead of needing to bounce between two lists. We can also wait several months before changing. Who knows, there may be other changes down the roa

Re: [REQUEST] XML Graphics setup

2004-11-01 Thread Jeremias Maerki
I can't tell what side-effects will arise from what I requested. I was hoping there weren't any. Why don't you just ask the infrastructure people? They will know better. PS. Can we please use general@ for such discussions to minimize cross-posting? By now, everyone interested in the XML Graphics s

Re: [REQUEST] XML Graphics setup

2004-11-01 Thread Clay Leeds
NOTE: This was sent to fop-dev & batik-dev as I have a question about the mailing lists I'd like to clarify before we 'ask' [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Oct 31, 2004, at 1:28 AM, Jeremias Maerki wrote: Dear infrastructure people, the board has recently accepted the proposal for creation of the XML Graphi