Ok, I worked on the patch. Some notes:
Mark C. Allman wrote:
These files just have a mayContainMarker() method added:
I don't understand the advantage of this. Checks for
proper FO structure are flaky anyway. You also canned
the check that a marker can be preceded by whitespace.
This is
Christian Geisert wrote:
Thanks for contribution but as I'm planing to do the 0.20.5 release
tomorrow (really ;-) it's just to late for it.
I want to take a closer look at this:
1. We need to keep a list of all pages. If a marker is referenced on a
later page we need to be able to retrieve
.
-- Mark C. Allman
-- Allman Professional Consulting, Inc.
-- www.allmanpc.com, 617-947-4263
-Original Message-
From: J.Pietschmann [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, February 06, 2003 8:14 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Changes to maintenance release to support fo:marker
