Joerg,
For major changes like this, it would be a good idea to tag the tree
before committing. The easiest way, probably, is to get ask someone
else with a current version to update and tag before you commit.
Peter
J.Pietschmann wrote:
> Hi all,
> I've replaced most of the JDK 1.0 containers
Jeremias Maerki wrote:
> I'm not so happy about this one. I know I'm also guilty of doing more
> work for the maintenance branch than for the redesign, but "stealing"
> code from the unfinished redesign for the maintenance branch seems to me
> like starting to take its breath away.
The problem is
On Fri, 2002-08-02 at 10:10, Jeremias Maerki wrote:
> I'm not so happy about this one. I know I'm also guilty of doing more
> work for the maintenance branch than for the redesign, but "stealing"
> code from the unfinished redesign for the maintenance branch seems to me
> like starting to take its
Sorry, Joerg. I haven't seen your earlier message where you announced
the changes. Should have read the messages in the right order... But my
oppinion stands.
Jeremias Maerki
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For add
On 01.08.2002 23:09:32 J.Pietschmann wrote:
> Hi all,
> I've replaced most of the JDK 1.0 containers by 1.2 containers
> in the maintenance branch, ready to commit. The PDF produced
> from FOP examples compares ok with PDF produced before the
> conversion. I might have screwed up other renderers,
