It's my understanding, that right now keep-with-next is only implemented on
the table-row element. What's more, you can only use it when you know you
will not have any more rows than will fit on a page. Otherwise FOP goes into
an endless loop.
> -Original Message-
> From: Jörg Flotho [m
keep-with-next is implemented only for tables.
Take a look at docs\html-docs\implemented.html under the FOP home directory
to find out what is implemented.
Regards,
Mike
-Original Message-
From: Jörg Flotho [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 26. november 2001 14:33
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
keep-with-previous is also implemented.
You are right regarding the infinite loop. I have worked around this problem
by estimating the number of rows in my table, and if it larger than a page
(in my case 54 rows) I first output a page-brake and then build the table
without using the keep-with-nex
hi,
afaik this should work for keeping together
table-rows.
so you maybe try to make something like this
+---+
| header | row1
+---+
| |
| paragraph | row2
| |
+
Keep in mind that attempting to implement keeps this way is essentially a
stopgap measure. It is quite unlikely that the code will be useable for all
situations and will most likely be replaced.
As you outlined below there are a number of issues that make the current
implementation complicated an
Hi Bodo-
First, I don't think I qualify as better overlooking
FOP, since my one and only contribution is getting
that list-item thing to do what I wanted. But, here
are some things I found out during that process, and
answered below:
--- "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi Don, A
Hi Arved-
I didn't get any reply that the patch was comitted,
and I am stuck behind a firewall that doesn't allow IP
tunneling. So, I don't have access to the CVS
repository.
Don
--- Arved Sandstrom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Sure, absolutely, I'll help out as a resource.
>
> Did your patch
Hi Don, Arved
i would be greatfull to work with someone on a related problem, who
better overlooks FOP then i do at the moment .
right now i have some questions:
1. i do not fully understand about the numerical and symbolic values for
the keep-* stuff.
the standard says (in "4.8 Keeps and Brea
Sure, absolutely, I'll help out as a resource.
Did your patch get committed? If not I'll take care of it. Sorry I'm a bit
scattered...work is intense right now.
Regards,
Arved
At 09:03 AM 8/29/01 -0700, you wrote:
>Hi Arved-
>
>I submitted patches against 20.1 to do an effective
>keep-with-nex
Hi Arved-
I submitted patches against 20.1 to do an effective
keep-with-next on list-item-label and list-item-body,
except I assumed an implied keep-with-next on
list-item-label. I would be glad to work with bodo on
this time permitting. It would probably be best, so
that there are not two diff
Hi, Bodo
I'd be very happy to help. I'm badly sidelined due to work pressure, but
there is always some time I can pry loose...I'd rather spend that time
getting new developers up to speed.
I'll review the source this evening and give you a synopsis of what we are
facing here.
Regards,
Arved
11 matches
Mail list logo
