Glen Mazza wrote:
Therefore, I'm
happy to nominate Finn Bock for committer
+1
J.Pietschmann
J.Pietschmann wrote:
Glen Mazza wrote:
Therefore, I'm
happy to nominate Finn Bock for committer
+1
+1
--
Oleg Tkachenko
http://www.tkachenko.com/blog
Multiconn Technologies, Israel
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25732.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25743.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25743.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25732.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25732.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25732.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
Hi,
I was looking for xsl-fo test suites on the net and found
http://www.w3.org/Style/XSL/TestSuite/
but for some reason all the test in the NIST zip file uses master-name
instead of master-reference on the fo:page-sequence's.
fo:page-sequence master-name=test-page-master
Is there some
-Original Message-
From: Finn Bock [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi,
I was looking for xsl-fo test suites on the net and found
http://www.w3.org/Style/XSL/TestSuite/
but for some reason all the test in the NIST zip file uses master-name
instead of master-reference on the
I was looking for xsl-fo test suites on the net and found
http://www.w3.org/Style/XSL/TestSuite/
but for some reason all the test in the NIST zip file uses master-name
instead of master-reference on the fo:page-sequence's.
fo:page-sequence master-name=test-page-master
[Andreas L. Delmelle]
-Original Message-
From: Bertrand Delacretaz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Seems like no one has voted on this yet? Must be this Christmas thing...
Indeed, it's holidays... I almost felt compelled to add my own (invalid) +1,
just to have _some_ answer ;)
Happy Holidays ( to everyone who
On Wednesday 24 December 2003 15:39, Andreas L. Delmelle wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Finn Bock [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi,
I was looking for xsl-fo test suites on the net and found
http://www.w3.org/Style/XSL/TestSuite/
but for some reason all the test in the
On Dec 24, 2003, at 8:55 AM, Bernd Brandstetter wrote:
On Wednesday 24 December 2003 15:39, Andreas L. Delmelle wrote:
Apparently this was admitted by earlier versions of the spec. Older
versions of FOP still supported this, but the latest version throws an
error...
wouldn't it be reasonable to
HI all:
I developed the NIST test suite. I will look into this issue Friday
morning. Regrettably I can't dot this minute. I was under the
impression that the stated problem was solved years ago.
I will post something soon after Christmas.
Carmelo
At 03:29 PM 12/24/2003 +0100, you wrote:
Hi,
Yes, thankfully Bertrand came to the rescue for us
here!
Merry Christmas and Happy New Year everyone! I'll be
back to FOP this weekend.
Regards,
Glen
--- Andreas L. Delmelle [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Bertrand Delacretaz
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Seems
-Original Message-
From: Clay Leeds [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Dec 24, 2003, at 8:55 AM, Bernd Brandstetter wrote:
wouldn't it be reasonable to also accept the obsolete 'master-name'
and to
just print out a corresponding warning message instead of throwing an
error? AFAIK,
17 matches
Mail list logo