/workspace/ant/dist/lib/ant-nodeps.jar:/usr/local/gump/public/workspace/ant/dist/lib/ant.jar:/usr/local/gump/public/workspace/xml-batik/batik-20040725/lib/batik-util.jar:/usr/local/gump/public/workspace/xml-batik/batik-20040725/lib/batik-swing.jar:/usr/local/gump/public/workspace/xml-batik/batik
-20040725/lib/batik-util.jar:/usr/local/gump/public/workspace/xml-batik/batik-20040725/lib/batik-swing.jar:/usr/local/gump/public/workspace/xml-batik/batik-20040725/lib/batik-css.jar:/usr/local/gump/public/workspace/xml-batik/batik-20040725/lib/batik-bridge.jar:/usr/local/gump/public/workspace/xml-batik
+---+
| Bugzilla Bug ID |
| +-+
| | Status: UNC=Unconfirmed NEW=New ASS=Assigned
Glen Mazza wrote:
--- Peter B. West [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Jeremias' ideas about factoring out useful
stand-alone elements from the
combination of FOP and Batik are essential to the
direction I am taking
with layout and rendering, aside from being a Good
Thing in their own
right.
Yes, I've
I have tried to build the site with forrest, without much success. I
had a few problems:
1. Validation error. I solved this problem by creating an OASIS catalog.
2. Files in build/webapps/content are missing. These problems can be solved
by copying src/documentation/content into webapps, or
Thanks. I did not know about the change. It certainly is a better
writing style.
I am still finishing the details of my documentation. After that I
want to work on the layout.
Regards, Simon
On Fri, Jul 23, 2004 at 09:20:50PM -0700, Glen Mazza wrote:
Yes, the way I see it, one of FOP's
I am preparing my documentation for check-in into the repository. What
would be a suitable place. A directory in
src/documentation/content/xdocs? Would that be in the way of the
forrest build of the web site?
Regards, Simon
--
Simon Pepping
home page: http://www.leverkruid.nl
On Jul 25, 2004, at 11:43 AM, Simon Pepping wrote:
I am preparing my documentation for check-in into the repository. What
would be a suitable place. A directory in
src/documentation/content/xdocs? Would that be in the way of the
forrest build of the web site?
Regards, Simon
I've been thinking
Simon, a word of caution*, I believe that anything
that goes into the Apache repository will need to be
copyright The Apache Software Foundation and only The
Apache Software Foundation. (Just look at the bottom
of any of the FOP site's web pages.) Else, best not
to commit it--we can always add
Oh please do...
--- Simon Pepping [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
After that I
want to work on the layout.
Regards, Simon
Thanks for the elaboration--also the links to the pull
parsing sites.
Glen
--- Peter B. West [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
All of the requirements for inputs, transformations,
etc, are the same,
because I am using SAX under the hood. But when a
native pull parser
comes along, say as a result
Glen Mazza wrote:
Simon, a word of caution*, I believe that anything
that goes into the Apache repository will need to be
copyright The Apache Software Foundation and only The
Apache Software Foundation. (Just look at the bottom
No, the contribution is covered by the CLA (which you should have
12 matches
Mail list logo