DO NOT REPLY [Bug 20411] - German hyphenation is ^H^H^Hwas missing

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

Re: Area Tree vs. subsequent renderer (was Re: FO property expressions)

Peter's right. We've done some loud thinking a few months back (Dec/Jan, I think) about the possibility to create several output files from the same area tree. At the moment anyway, the renderer provides the fonts and the layout engine adjusts to that. So, that means that the area tree differs depe

Re: [GUMP] Build Failure - xml-fop

On 02.06.2003 14:12:43 Thomas E Deweese wrote: > > "JM" == Jeremias Maerki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > JM> However, I'm worrying about binary compatibility. At the moment we > JM> have to tell our users that they have to use the Batik-version > JM> delivered with FOP. I'd like to see Bati

Re: Area Tree vs. subsequent renderer (was Re: FO property expressions)

Glen Mazza wrote: Thanks, Peter, for the explanation on the property/inheritance computations--I have one more question, perhaps anyone can answer (The Area Tree/Renderer explanations on the Design Tab is somewhat vague on this point): For those output formats requiring an area tree (i.e., non-T

Re: [GUMP] Build Failure - xml-fop

> "JM" == Jeremias Maerki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: JM> However, I'm worrying about binary compatibility. At the moment we JM> have to tell our users that they have to use the Batik-version JM> delivered with FOP. I'd like to see Batik's API stabilize some JM> more so people can just downloa

Re: Thoughts on design - FO expressions in markers

Fopdevs, Further to this topic. Peter B. West wrote: Yes, and this whole post was a bit of a disaster. The point I had fuzzily in mind was that the resolution of marker properties can only occur as the area tree (of the fo:flow) is being constructed. Only then does "current page" have any mea

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 20411] - German hyphenation is ^H^H^Hwas missing

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 20411] New: - German hyphenation is ^H^H^Hwas missing

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

[GUMP] Build Failure - xml-fop

This email is autogenerated from the output from: Buildfile: build.xml init-avail: [echo] Jimi Support NOT Present [echo]

[GUMP] Build Failure - xml-fop-maintenance

This email is autogenerated from the output from: Buildfile: build.xml init-avail: init-filters-jdk14: [echo] JDK

Re: [GUMP] Build Failure - xml-fop

Looks like your message simply got stuck in the moderator's queue. On 30.05.2003 18:17:31 Thomas DeWeeese wrote: > Jeremias Maerki wrote: > > >Hi Batik-Devs, > > > >the latest changes in Batik broke both the maintenance branch and HEAD > >of FOP: > > > >http://cvs.apache.org/builds/gump/2003-05-3

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 20407] - [PATCH] Configure image caching using the configuration file

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 20407] New: - [PATCH] Configure image caching using the configuration file

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

Area Tree vs. subsequent renderer (was Re: FO property expressions)

Thanks, Peter, for the explanation on the property/inheritance computations--I have one more question, perhaps anyone can answer (The Area Tree/Renderer explanations on the Design Tab is somewhat vague on this point): For those output formats requiring an area tree (i.e., non-TXT, RTF, etc.), th

RE: "Team" page

Looks good -- would you please update my email address to my "work" address on the team page: glen.mazza.at.eds.com. (.at. like all the other email addresses on that page to avoid spam concerns!) Thanks, Glen --- Victor Mote <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Glen Mazza wrote: > > > My email was meant

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 20398] - [PATCH] removing org.apache.fop.tools.xslt package

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 20398] New: - [PATCH] removing org.apache.fop.tools.xslt package

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 20397] - [PATCH] Move Structure & LayoutHandlers to fo/area packages

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 20397] - [PATCH] Move Structure & LayoutHandlers to fo/area packages

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 20397] New: - [PATCH] Move Structure & LayoutHandlers to fo/area packages

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

Bug report for Fop [2003/06/01]

+---+ | Bugzilla Bug ID | | +-+ | | Status: UNC=Unconfirmed NEW=New ASS=Assigned