Glen Mazza wrote:
> From my perspective, apps is pretty well cleaned up
> now. (I'll try my luck at the properties and the
> AWTRenderer next.)
Peter has done some work on properties, but I am not clear on what the
status of that is. If I understood, he was going to place the properties as
field
Jeremias Maerki wrote:
> Commons IO is currently in a state of flux while it is being refactored.
> I think it is a bit premature to fix the deprecation warnings just now,
> and it doesn't hurt in HEAD's current state. I'll do the necessary
> changes when I feel that Commons IO is ready. Ok for yo
--- Victor Mote <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I mention this because I know that Glen is
> trying to get apps
> cleaned up. I think creation of "control" should
> help.
>
>From my perspective, apps is pretty well cleaned up
now. (I'll try my luck at the properties and the
AWTRenderer next.)
Do
Jeremias Maerki wrote:
Right here,
Well, that's 50% :-)
monitoring but not having enough time to actively
participate in coding.
I had more the heads-up for participation in preparation
of the status report in mind...
I'm lagging behind in coding myself.
J.Pietschmann
---
Right here, monitoring but not having enough time to actively
participate in coding. I saw your entry and had nothing to add. The
suboptimal wording didn't occur to me. But as you said, it's a Wiki.
Everyone can help improve.
On 16.08.2003 18:53:28 J.Pietschmann wrote:
> Where are our PMC members?
Commons IO is currently in a state of flux while it is being refactored.
I think it is a bit premature to fix the deprecation warnings just now,
and it doesn't hurt in HEAD's current state. I'll do the necessary
changes when I feel that Commons IO is ready. Ok for you guys?
I'll see what I can do
Glen Mazza wrote:
Joerg, let's not divide ourselves into "main
developers" and "minor developers". Perhaps "absence
of many of the committers" would be a better way to
phrase it.
Well, "many" isn't the correct expression either, so I removed the
phrase completely.
And remember, it's a Wiki, you c
Victor Mote wrote:
> BTW, there are some deprecation warnings coming from gump also. I haven't
> had a chance to look into them yet.
They are related related to our dependency on jakarta-commons-io, which we
will need to upgrade to get the warnings to disappear. Since this is a
"sandbox" project,
