Re: Storing the Locator instance in FONode.

2004-10-01 Thread Finn Bock
[Glen] I see. I liked Locator because I can get away with passing in one parameter into the vCN() instead of three. (But I don't think we'll need to change that portion of the code because whenever vCN() is being called, the Locator *is* accurate--would you agree?) Yes. regards, finn

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 31502] New: - UTF-8

2004-10-01 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31502. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

Re: cvs commit: xml-fop/src/java/org/apache/fop/render/rtf TableAttributesConverter.java

2004-10-01 Thread Jeremias Maerki
Finn, it seems to me that you probably forgot the check in all your changes. FOP doesn't compile ATM. The method makeBorder is missing. On 01.10.2004 11:46:36 bckfnn wrote: bckfnn 2004/10/01 02:46:36 Modified:src/java/org/apache/fop/render/rtf

Re: Remove image.JimiImage from HEAD?

2004-10-01 Thread Dalibor Topic
Glen Mazza wrote: --- Jeremias Maerki [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Why are you so keen on removing stuff? I'd be more concerned about adding the stuff that's missing for an initial release. Just cleaning up for the next release. Jimi works fine for some people. No reason to remove this. OK, so it

Re: Remove image.JimiImage from HEAD?

2004-10-01 Thread Jeremias Maerki
Not a stupid question at all, but no, with FOP 0.20.5 you still need either JIMI or JAI for PNG support. But it may well be that the next FOP version will support PNG without an additional library. For now, you're stuck, though. On 01.10.2004 15:31:15 Dalibor Topic wrote: I haven't been

Re: Remove image.JimiImage from HEAD?

2004-10-01 Thread Dalibor Topic
Jeremias Maerki wrote: Not a stupid question at all, but no, with FOP 0.20.5 you still need either JIMI or JAI for PNG support. But it may well be that the next FOP version will support PNG without an additional library. For now, you're stuck, though. thanks for the quick responce, Jeremias. I'm

Re: Remove image.JimiImage from HEAD?

2004-10-01 Thread Jeremias Maerki
If you got a long breath, yes. We're are still a few months from a release. The layout code is in the process of being completely rewritten, so many features available in 0.20.5 are still missing. On 01.10.2004 17:10:34 Dalibor Topic wrote: Jeremias Maerki wrote: Not a stupid question at all,

Re: Remove image.JimiImage from HEAD?

2004-10-01 Thread Jeremias Maerki
On 01.10.2004 18:06:13 Clay Leeds wrote: Please clarify: As the Subject implies, Glen's original message indicated he wanted to remove Jimi (I understand that won't be the case now). He said nothing of removing JAI, and as far as I understand, FOP-1.0 will still need JAI for PNG support

Re: Remove image.JimiImage from HEAD?

2004-10-01 Thread Clay Leeds
On Oct 1, 2004, at 2:30 PM, Jeremias Maerki wrote: On 01.10.2004 18:06:13 Clay Leeds wrote: Please clarify: As the Subject implies, Glen's original message indicated he wanted to remove Jimi (I understand that won't be the case now). He said nothing of removing JAI, and as far as I understand,

Build broken?

2004-10-01 Thread Glen Mazza
I can't seem to compile HEAD--it may be related to Finn's latest changes. Javac is complaining about an unknown BorderAttributesConverter.makeBorder(...) in render.rtf.TableAttributesConverter. Thanks, Glen